User talk:King of Hearts

Old talk can be found at /Archive.

Welcome to the Commons, King of Hearts!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, it makes this: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|Correct name}}` For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Siebrand 21:27, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Has the number of daily file uploads been increased above this limit of 10?

User talk:King of Hearts/Archive/2025/Q1#Question related to daily upload count for A1Cafel --- Has the number of daily file uploads been increased above this limit of 10? If yes, do you have a link? Thank you in advance, -- Ooligan (talk) 16:04, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 120#A1Cafel upload restriction review. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:11, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Briones Regional Park April 2024 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:20, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Briones Regional Park April 2024 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 12:48, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nice composition. I recommend submitting these images to The Photo Challenge of this month. --Tiouraren 15:38, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Briones Regional Park April 2024 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:20, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Briones Regional Park April 2024 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:48, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Briones Regional Park April 2024 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Argenberg 16:03, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Briones Regional Park April 2024 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 02:37, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Briones Regional Park April 2024 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 02:37, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Briones Regional Park April 2024 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Briones Regional Park April 2024 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 02:37, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Briones Regional Park April 2024 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:23, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Briones Regional Park April 2024 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:23, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Briones Regional Park April 2024 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 23:05, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Briones Regional Park April 2024 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Olivier LPB 08:06, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Briones Regional Park April 2024 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:31, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Briones Regional Park April 2024 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Buidhe 04:41, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Briones Regional Park April 2024 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Buidhe 04:41, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Briones Regional Park April 2024 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 11:36, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Briones Regional Park April 2024 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tuxyso 05:41, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Briones Regional Park April 2024 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 13:39, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Your royal Highness, I have traveled from the far north Kingdom of Wikipedia, in a mission to read the new messages. The Squirrel Conspiracy left a message that says I violated the copyright law of the Commons Kingdom, it was level 2 warnings, heavily disappointed, I sent a message to her/his talk page, saying that I'm sorry and I'm very young, but made a mistake by saying my real age (gonna fix after the letter), which violates the privacy policy for children in Wikipedia. Not knowing what to do, I found the Queen of Hearts in the editing history, and she led me to your royal palace. My request is for you to teach me the ways of the Wikipedian Kingdom (since I already have 2 level 1 warnings), and the ways of the Wikimedia Commons Kingdom (since I already have 1 level 1 warning and 2 level 2 warnings).

Yours sincerely

BeastBoy-X (talk) 22:38, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey King

Wassup my liege,

Could you delete the first version of File:Apple iMac 4G (32871160027) (blurred).jpg as per {{Non-free embedded revdel}} for the content on the screen?

Cheerio, Bremps... 06:00, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:04, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Help restoring Image

Hi King I have the ticket number. For some reason it was not letting me reply normally on the other page, so I d not know if it earmarked you or not. Here is the ticket numberL [Ticket#: 2025051710002553] File:Example.jFile:Gavin D’Costa.jpgpg Historyguy1138 (talk) 19:28, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi King. I see you partially restored the image. Thanks.

Although I noticed it said "However, the message was not sufficient to confirm permission for this file. This may, among other reasons, be because there was no explicit release under a free license"

I am newer to that, but to get a free license. Do I just have the owner copy and fill in the release text in the link?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Declaration_of_consent_for_all_enquiries

If he does that does he just send this text to "permissions-commonswikimedia.org (if you are releasing images, audio, or video)."

The original ticket number is [Ticket#: 2025051710002553]? But does the owner need to resubmit a https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator to link that email or not?

Thanks. (: Historyguy1138 (talk) 13:50, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Historyguy1138: This is because we received a license statement from the subject, rather than the photographer. In the absence of a copyright transfer agreement, the copyright in a portrait is held by the photographer, not the subject. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:39, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see, I see. Hmmmmm not sure about the photographer to be honest. I do believe the subject in this case is the owner of the photo. I can double confirm both. Would that work? Historyguy1138 (talk) 18:00, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That will work if he really is the copyright holder of the photo, but he will need to have a very clear justification for why. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:24, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copy that if I understand him correctly. He had that photo taken as a headshot for himself, and he allows people to use it to introduce himself to institutions, for example as a guest professor or lecturer. But again I will double confirm this.

Should I also send him the declaration of consent? Or at this point is that unnecessary? Thanks. (:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Declaration_of_consent_for_all_enquiries Historyguy1138 (talk) 18:30, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Without a formal arrangement, he is not the copyright holder of the photo. He will need to ask the photographer to send in a copyright release. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:50, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see. So assuming then that it is the case that the photographer is the copyright and not also the subject.

Do I just send him a link to the photo, send him the VRT generator link, and the declaration of consent links?

Or it the copyright release something different? Historyguy1138 (talk) 19:06, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the photographer will need to go through the same process that you just had the subject go through. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:52, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha. I will confirm what's going on on that end and get back to you with some results as soon as they are presented to me. And thank you for your help during this process. (: Historyguy1138 (talk) 19:54, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests for serveral files

Hello, this is Saimmx. I have filed some deletion requests you kept since I believe it is a fictional flag:

Since the nomination instructions said that I need to notify users who kept it, I think I have to contact you. Previously, you didn't delete these files because it was in used, but now they are only used in user pages, so I think it is time to let them go. Thanks for reading, and have a good day. Saimmx (talk) 05:42, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Briones Regional Park April 2024 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 23:37, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ziv 01:04, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Briones Regional Park April 2024 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 23:37, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Briones Regional Park April 2024 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 23:37, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Briones Regional Park April 2024 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:12, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tistory

Hi, I restored these files, but I can't find any free license at the source. I only see a NC license at [1]. Any idea? Thanks, Yann (talk) 07:04, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: https://web.archive.org/web/20180526092253/https://foodmacha.tistory.com/534 links to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.ko at the bottom right. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:48, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Briones Regional Park April 2024 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 01:53, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Briones Regional Park April 2024 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good but it looks like it's leaning out (see the structures on the far left) --Poco a poco 01:53, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Poco a poco: In general I don't tend to correct perspective on landscapes, since it ends up throwing away a lot of the image (especially when pointing downwards by such a large angle), and any structures are incidental and barely perceptible. --King of Hearts 04:16, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. I think the structures mentioned above are so small that it doesn't matter if they are tilted or not. --Екатерина Борисова 01:37, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at COM:VRTN#File:RH lockup black (1).png

You are invited to join the discussion at COM:VRTN#File:RH lockup black (1).png. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:39, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi King of Hearts. Since you're an admin on English Wikipedia and Commons, and also a VRT member, perhaps you can help sort this out. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:40, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]