Jump to content

User talk:Mateus2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
User Mateus2019 🌫 Mattes
··· navAID ···  
for selected pages within this user namespace 
Contributions
Personal usage
➢➢ Studies



➢➢ Favorite files
➢➢ Projects



Chandler Woodcock photo

[edit]

Hi the file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chandler_Woodcock.jpg is inaccurate Chandler Woodcock is not pictured it is Jim Connolly. Can we atleast name it something else so editors don't keep getting it confused and adding it to his article? Putitonamap98 (talk) 23:38, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. You removed the GPS EXIF tag from this file stating that it’s already coded, but the file only has {{Object location}}, which is not the same thing as camera location. They can and should be used together. Is there anything specific you have in mind regarding how to treat these? Thanks. Rkieferbaum (talk) 23:30, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! I realize it's only a 2m difference, but, like I said, object and camera location tags serve different purposes. I can search either or both, I can search for images taken somewhere or of somewhere, etc. The distance between them also tells me what kind of image it is (a closeup, a landscape, etc). Thanks for undestanding and happy editing! Rkieferbaum (talk) 13:52, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Care

[edit]

Thank you for your care ))) 201.150.118.26 14:52, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:193-Randa-HB.jpg

[edit]

Warum wurde Kategorie Randa entfernt? Es grüßt Friedrich-Karl Mohr Friedo (talk) 08:11, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(difff) Servus, weil sie redundant ist (etwas anderes wäre, wenn das Schild genau dort aufgestellt wäre [allerdings fehlt jedweder Hinweis hierzu]. VG --Mateus2019 (talk) 09:07, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
File:GER — BY — Lkr. München — Gemeinde Baierbrunn — Baierbrunn Dorf — Hermann-Roth-Straße 22 (Wohnhaus · D-1-84-113-3) 2024-09-22 Mattes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Krd 07:40, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]