User talk:Túrelio

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

---

ATTENTION: Please use my talk page rather than emailing me.

noframe

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic.

---

Please keep discussions together:

• If I was starting a thread on your talk page, please answer there. I will watch your talk page.
• If you started a discussion here on my talk page, I will answer here.

All requests for and notifications of re-use of my images on Commons have been moved to Requests & Notifications.

If you can't find a comment or an older discussion here, take a look whether it is in one of my archives:
Archive1 (latest), Archive2 (2007), Archive3 (2008), Archive4 (2009), Archive5 (2010), Archive6 (2011), Archive7 (2012), Archive8 (2013), Archive9 (2014), Archive10 (2015), Archive11 (2016), Archive12 (2017), Archive13 (2018), Archive14 (2019), Archive15 (2020), Archive16 (2021), Archive17 (2022), Archive18 (2023).

Potential copyvio farm

Hi Túrelio, I noticed you deleted File:Rescuer onlooker at the landslide location on 01 August 2024.jpg after finding out it was a copyvio. I was looking into this user due to some disruption on en.wiki, and in addition to the copyright notices on their talkpage File:Participants in first summit.png seems to be taken directly from this site. The two current socks that have uploaded images are here and here. I actually tineyed them before I knew they were socks, and didn't find anything, but since becoming aware of the larger pattern the uploads seem potentially concerning. Best, Chipmunkdavis (talk) 16:01, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Anti-discrimination Students Movement procession on 2 August.webp

How can a file under Creative Commons license be deleted for copyright infringement? On what grounds was it deleted? Was its license checked? - Ash wki (talk) 15:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Anti-discrimination Students Movement procession on 2 August.webp has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation because it comes from: https://businesspostbd.com/files/thumbs/daily-media/Dated/2024/July/14/964x551/Print-04.webp Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Ash wki (talk) 15:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Where is the evidence that this photo has been put under a free license? The provided source doesn't say so. The author, who is the only who can release it under a CC-BY license, is unknown, as you claim. --Túrelio (talk) 20:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Redirecting to duplicate file

It's absolutely unnecessary: File:Kenkichi Tomimoto and his family, end of 1917.jpg. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 79.50.3.130 (talk) 07:39, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Redirects are created automatically by the duplicate-script. --Túrelio (talk) 09:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Ok. 82.61.202.80 10:29, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Can you do the same redirects with these: File talk:Kenkichi Tomimoto and Shinichi Sasagawa, circa 1917-1918.jpg, File talk:Kenkichi Tomimoto (right) with unknown, circa 1917.jpg, File talk:Kenkichi Tomimoto and his daughter.jpg? Thank you. 82.61.202.80 10:36, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Please, read very well my instructions: it's the opposite files to be redirected. Don't do the same error and invert immediately it for "Kenkichi Tomimoto & Shinichi Sasagawa" and "Kenkichi Tomimoto (1917)". 82.61.202.80 10:45, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Each one of the duplicate-files were protected (likely due to previous edit-warring). Therefore I had to redirect to the protected versions, not the other way round. --Túrelio (talk) 10:51, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

"Yamamoto Heikichi" is very good, with the full page and the Japanese explanation. Can you redirect "Yamamoto Heikichi (1913)" to it? Thank you. 79.16.11.68 11:25, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Can you do it? 193.207.153.240 07:55, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

I've tagged the file. --Túrelio (talk) 10:23, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Can you delete "Yamamoto Heikichi (1913)"? It's only an exactly-scaled down of "Yamamoto Heikichi". Thank you. 193.207.108.147 12:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Can you do it? 79.18.119.157 10:33, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Letter from Selena at the Village Pump

Hi Túrelio, I hope you're fine. Since you're an active admin and editor here, I wanted to flag a potentially interesting discussion at the Village Pump, started by Selena Deckelmann about finding a better way of supporting Commons. Maybe you can consider, if you have time, to share your thoughts? Thanks in advance! Sannita (WMF) (talk) 14:20, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Administrator's Barnstar
	Just for doing what you do! Thanks. Nv8200p (talk) 15:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC))

File:Convair 580 turbo prop airplane.gif

Hi, would you take a look at File:Convair 580 turbo prop airplane.gif ? I am also wondering if an uploader is allowed to remove copyright violation CSD on their own from a file where an allegation of copyright violation is made.

I have CSD'd as a copyright violation, because the description provided by the uploader which says he was given permission by presumptive copyright owner's representative for conditional use only, which is contradictory to CC-BY-SA even though uploader set the machine readable copyright as CC-BY-SA. The uploader removed my CSD tag. The description says The image came from Farrow J. Smith who was a director of Alexander Dawson, Inc. at 4045 South Spencer St., Suite 212, Las Vegas, Nevada. He has given me permission to use this picture in publications about Girard B. Henderson. so it's pretty obvious they only granted permission for very specific use and there's no indication implied or direct the uploader had permission to release the image under CC-BY-SA. Graywalls (talk) 02:13, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

I've put the file into a regular DR; though, it seems clear that the permission is not sufficient. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 08:58, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Now they're arguing Cc-by-sa-4.0-heirs. Do you feel this is a reasonable application in this case? Graywalls (talk) 22:10, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Missing categories

Hi, as these files are currently protected, can you edit the missing categories:

• Category:Akira Tomimoto: Kenkichi Tomimoto and his daughter; Kenkichi Tomimoto, his family and his mother in front of his workshop, 1918.
• Category:Sue Tomimoto: Kenkichi Tomimoto, his family and his mother in front of his workshop, 1918.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.4.238.59 (talk) 09:21, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

I couldn't find the first one. Please provide full filename. --Túrelio (talk) 10:35, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

"File:Kenkichi Tomimoto and his daughter.jpg" 87.8.237.252 10:47, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

"File:Kenkichi Tomimoto, his family and his mother in front of his workshop, 1918.jpg": Akira is the one with her paternal grandmother, while Sue the one on her mother's hands. 87.8.237.252 10:49, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 10:51, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

"File:Kenkichi Tomimoto, his family and his mother in front of his workshop, 1918.jpg": Akira cathegory is better before Sue's. 87.8.237.252 10:52, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

"File:Kenkichi Tomimoto and his daughter.jpg": Akira category is better after her father's. 87.8.237.252 10:53, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Can you correct those places so it's closed' Thank you. 79.16.236.108 11:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Provided I understand you correctly: The order in which the categories appear on the image page is meaningless. --Túrelio (talk) 11:33, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

In these two photos there is an error of transliteration from Japanese: the first daughter's name is not "Akira", but "Yō" (ヨウ, Yō) instead (see: https://books.rakuten.co.jp/rb/1552092/). Can you correct it in the summary and replace her category with "Yo Takai"? Thank you. 82.58.205.193 12:17, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. Can you also rename with "Yo" her four photos in the category with "Akira" in the title: "Akira and Sue Tomimoto.jpg", "Akira Tomimoto (1919).jpg", "Akira Tomimoto (1920).jpg", "Kazue and Akira Tomimoto.png"? Thanks. 79.40.89.104 10:39, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Locomotoras Albacete

Gute Nacht Túrelio. Ich schreibe Ihnen zu diesem Thema. Es wurde nachgewiesen, dass es sich bei dieser Geschichte um eine Erfindung zur Werbung für ein Buch handelte. Hier hast du den Ursprung der Bilder, diese Person ist der Schöpfer. Der esːWiki-Artikel und der Wikidata-Datensatz wurden gelöscht. Ich denke, dass es im Commons keine Spur von dieser Werbekampagne geben sollte, oder? CFA1877 (talk) 22:26, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Request for Autopatrolled Rights

I hope you are doing well. I am requesting autopatrolled rights on Wikimedia Commons. Although I have only made 5-6 uploads so far, I have ensured that each file adheres to the platform's guidelines, including proper copyright, licensing, and categorization.I am familiar with Commons' policies and am committed to maintaining high standards in my future contributions as well.Thank you for your time and consideration. TypeInfotalk 10:26, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Construction by BN

You deleted one of my user categories without repairing or redirecting. PLEASE COMPLETE AND REPAIR. It is presently unacceptable. Bengt Nyman (talk) 17:30, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Seems you have forgotten that it was YOU, who had asked for its deletion "Please delete empty user category no longer used".[1] --Túrelio (talk) 21:03, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Unfair Deletion

You deleted a file for a politician by the name of Janelle Bynum whom has a campaign website that is considered a public domain janellebynum.com/media-center with free downloadable images with use for articles/press. I emailed the campaign and was given full permission to upload any image from the campaign website to Wikipedia. File:Portrait of Janelle Bynum.jpg. Please un delete this file, thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hellollo12 (talk • contribs) 23:20, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi, "campaign website that is considered a public domain" - that's a misconception. Being shown on a website/offered for download does not equal a free license, as required per our policy COM:L. Anyway, if you asked the rightsholder for release under a free license, this may work. However, the rightsholder needs to send the confirmation/permission directly to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS); forwarding is not accepted. And remember, a mere "permission for Wikipedia" is not accepted. It needs be released under a free license, such as CC-BY or CC-BY-SA. --Túrelio (talk) 09:48, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Kazue Tomimoto.png

Can you edit this file on her en.wikipedia.org page? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 79.51.236.40 (talk) 10:32, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Undelete request for File:SydneySweeney2024.png

Hi Túrelio. I'm sorry to bother you, but I saw that an image I had uploaded (File:SydneySweeney2024.png) was deleted with the accompanying message "No indication at YouTube that this released under a CC or similar license." However, the YouTube video that it came from now says in its description that it has a "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)." I wanted to ask if my file could be undeleted. Thank you very much. Fsalis (talk) 04:32, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done.- --Túrelio (talk) 08:25, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Thank you very much 👍 Fsalis (talk) 02:58, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Bluewiki.svg

Wish you happy holidays! Looks like you deleted the File: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Bluewiki.svg&action=history by redirect onto a testing page. A mistake? – Doc Taxon • Talk • 01:15, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Doc Taxon, ich habe es mal wieder hergestellt. Es war von unserem Bot, der Duplikate sucht und markiert, nominiert worden. --Túrelio (talk) 13:31, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi! Danke für die Wiederherstellung. Diese Test-Seiten sollten vom Bot ausgeschlossen werden, das lässt sich ziemlich leicht einprogrammieren. Vielleicht gibt es auch eine Robinson-List. Frohes Fest, – Doc Taxon • Talk • 09:57, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Deletion requests

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sankebetsu homes.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sankebetsu homes 02.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sankebetsu forest.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kesagake oak.jpg. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 79.30.36.63 (talk) 13:58, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Can you do delete them for copyvio, since nobody had answered, so it's closed? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.116.148.222 (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Maybe you can left "Sankebetsu homes", but the other three it's better to delete. 80.116.148.222 15:46, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

I have commented at one of the DRs. However, now a colleague has delete-decided all the mentioned DRs. --Túrelio (talk) 19:32, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

	* Happy Holidays! *
	Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:53, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Deleting empty categories...

On November 26, 2024 User:Joeyconnick moved page Category:Spadina (TTC) to Category:Spadina station, with an edit summary of "match main article title".

Near as I can tell, from his revision history, he made no attempt to discuss his concern over the category's name with other contributors.

On November 27, 2024, you deleted this very long-standing category, with the explanation "(incorrectly named) duplicate, content moved to Category:Spadina station)".

I am sorry, I am concerned that Joeyconnick's actions were very highly disruptive. Joeyconnick manually recategorized over one hundred images, putting them in his preferred category. Contributors are supposed to either open a discussion over the categories name, or place a {{Move}} template on the category. When they do that, if there is agreement with their new name proposal, a robot does the actual move, and that robot leaves a {{Category redirect}}.

Joeyconnick acted out of process, and, in my opinion, they should be strongly urged to never do this kind of thing again.

The standard process results in leaving a {{Category redirect}}. This is extremely important, for several reasons:

1. Long-standing category names may have been linked to from good-faith third-party sites. Those external links will still work if a {{Category redirect}} has been left. Those external links break when no {{Category redirect}} has been left. This makes the project look fragile and unreliable
2. Deleting long-standing category names, without leaving a redirect, imposes a completely unnecessary cognitive burden.

I've been working on transit related material for almost 20 years. That is long enough that I don't have to think about the category name for a TTC station. It has always been the name of the station, followed by the disambiguator "(TTC)".

Today I went to categorize an image of a TTC station, into Category:Spadina (TTC), only to find it was a redlink.

WTF! Why should I have to spend time trying to determine where the category is NOW, when a redirect would have automatically put the current name?

Now, maybe you had a good reason for not leaving a {{Category redirect}}... If so, I would appreciate that explanation. But, if the only reason you did not leave that {{Category redirect}} was you thought Joeyconnick had a good point, please don't do that. Please leave the {{Category redirect}}, just like the robots do. Geo Swan (talk) 02:49, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

• Hi Túrelio... I'm not going to engage in this absolute witchhunt that Geo Swan has cooked up in their fevered imagination except to point to how they've now addressed me twice on my Talk page, the most recent inappropriate and completely uncivil lambasting being here. Please feel free to let me know if you would like me to follow a different process for future category renames. Given their bad-faith assumptions, obsessive belief that all category renames need discussion, baseless accusations that I'm somehow out to "trick" admins, and frankly unbelievable tone, I certainly won't be following any of Geo Swan's guidance. —Joeyconnick (talk) 06:27, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Grüße

Hallo Túrelio, <br>

Ich wünsche Dir ein gesegnetes Weihnachtsfest und für das neue Jahr 2025 alles erdenklich Gute.<br>

Beste Grüße. Orchi (talk) 16:04, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

removal of photograph

Hi, Recently you removed a photograph of me on my wiki page. I don't know why it was removed since it is standard to include a photograph in these academic bios, and I am the owner of the photograph so there is no licensing issue and as far as I know, the picture was clear enough. Can it please be reposted or do I need to send a different kind of photograph? thanks.

Arnold Arluke aarluke@gmail.com 172.56.102.220 22:49, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi Arnold, as you were not logged-in when posting, I have no information to which image you are refering to. --Túrelio (talk) 10:29, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

I own the image, my friend took it of me. There is no licensing problem to insert it on my wiki page. Thank you for re-inserting it.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Arluke (talk • contribs) 13:52, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

I see, even though I own it, because it was posted on instagram, you can't use it here. I am uploading another photo that has not been posted anywhere. I hope you can use this one if it is clear enough. thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 172.56.102.220 (talk) 17:26, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

RodRabelo7 (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

RodRabelo7 (talk) 03:08, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Please revert recent deletion

Could please revert your deletion of File:BSicon rLIN jade.svg? The destination file for the redirect is incorrect, and I am uploading the file with the corrected "sky" coloration, but we need to retain the jade symbol. VanIsaac (en.wiki) 18:26, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:28, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! VanIsaac (en.wiki) 20:53, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

request

Please convert this image to svg. ‏‎ʜᴀʀʏᴀᴅ _talk 07:28, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Restore category

Category:1989 establishments in Ternopil Oblast Микола Василечко (talk) 11:06, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:22, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Deletion of "Organs in _" as a Misnomer for "Pipe organs in _"

This is incorrect on two accounts. First, there is nothing incorrect about "Organs in _" (for example, "Organs in Berlin"). Second, pipe organs are but one type of organ; for instance, reed organs are not pipe organs. As such do not delete or combine these topics. HwætGrimmalkin (talk) 09:08, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Wow. My deletion of "Category:Organs in Berlin" was performed in 2009! We have now 2025. --Túrelio (talk) 09:28, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

User:DerekFair

Could you please look at the photos of Berry College uploaded today by User:DerekFair. I looked at two of them, and both were obvious copyright violations, which you deleted. I'm sure if I hunted through the rest they are all copied from the internet. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:55, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

They are not all internet photos. You can delete it and other files. We've determined this is too bureaucratic and not worth the effort. DerekFair (talk) 22:13, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Please undelete

• Category:Nine Latin letter combinations

and likely a few others like it, as they are not empty again/anymore. (And happy new year!) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:05, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:23, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Sara James.jpg

Hey, any chance you could review this? Many thanks. ArturSik (talk) 19:04, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:23, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Remotec urc 2.jpg

File:Remotec urc 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Momcilostokanovic (talk) 19:27, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your effort

Hi Túrelio, thank you for your continued support. Thank you for deleting the many categories to which I had attached the deletion template. Sincerely yours.--Krorokeroro (talk) 07:49, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 15:41, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Deleted by mistake Stankinlogo2025.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stankinlogo2025.jpg

As stated previously this image has indeed been uploaded to https://www.artlebedev.ru/stankin/

But need to take into consideration a few moments:

1. This is the website of design studio Art. Lebedev Studio (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art._Lebedev_Studio), which has a common practice of uploading any of their work even if it was made for commercial uses (you can look up on their website, they even developed a logo for Yandex[2]);

2. The rebranding announcement of MSUT STANKIN university on their official VKontake[3] page[4] which has the same logo. Greedygrind (talk) 08:50, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Hmm, I'm still not sure what conclusion to draw from your explainations. The originally provided source, as well as www.artlebedev.ru/stankin/, carry no evidence for the claimed CC-license. --Túrelio (talk) 15:45, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Under which license would you suggest uploading it in this situation? Can you please recommend? Greedygrind (talk) 18:47, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Problem is, I don't see any evidence for a free license, as required for upload to Commons per COM:L. On the other hand, I find the logo being "creative" enough to assume that is is eligible for copyright. So, we have to assume that it is copyrighted. As the copyright usually is with the creator/artist, he or she would be the person who could release the work under a free license. So, you could try to contact the artist and ask him whether he would be willing to release the logo under a free license, such as CC-BY[5] or CC-BY-SA[6]. A permission "for use on Wikipedia" is not acceptable on Commons; not sure if it would be on :ru-Wikipedia. To be sure, even if freely licensed, the logo could be protected as a trademark. This would be no problem for upload to Commons, but could ease the decision of the artist. If the artist is willing, you should go to Commons:Email templates (or the Russian-language sub-site) and copy the permission-text in the squared box to your word-processor, add the filename (of full URL) of the image and send the prepared permission-template to the artist, ask him to read, date and sign it and to send it directly to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (Emails to this address are treated confidentially). --Túrelio (talk) 21:11, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Yaser Alsaidi.jpg

Hello Túrelio , you requested a Deletion for the image Yaser Alsaidi.jpg and added the reason is that it’s published from https://www.instagram.com/vip_gov and that’s not correct cause it’s published in a public domain and in the official Al Jazeera English YouTube channel and I edited this photo myself ( I tried to add the source link from YouTube and you can easily find it by searching “palestinian doctor in ukraine: draws parallels with gaza, endures personal”) so kindly remove your speedy deletion request. Victoria Kuchereno (talk) 14:40, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi Victoria Kuchereno,

in case you took this screenshot from this video, it is not in the public domain, but only under Youtube's default license, which is not compatible to Commons. A few videos on Youtube are under a compatible CC-license, but this is not. --Túrelio (talk) 14:47, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

I edited the image to add it to Commons so please undelete it and you can edit the license Victoria Kuchereno (talk) 15:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Editing an image which is copyrighted by somebody else, doesn't change the original copyright. --Túrelio (talk) 15:41, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

So how can I add this image to Commons? Victoria Kuchereno (talk) 15:44, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

There is no legal way to add this image to Commons. First, you would need to convince the rightsholder to release it under a Commons-compliant free license, such as CC-BY or CC-BY-SA. However, as this requires it to be free also for commercial re-use, it is very unlikely that the rightsholder will agree to this. --Túrelio (talk) 16:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Where can I send you the photos that I want to publish so you can check them before I publish, to ensure that such situation won’t happen again. Victoria Kuchereno (talk) 16:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Redirect problem

Hello, they were doubles of the files you redirected ː)

Thanks for your work, I'm going to ask soon to move some images to make the nameset coherentǃ Sciking (talk) 20:25, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi,

"they were doubles" - in that case, you had nominated the wrong files for deletion. In addition, if you use the speedy-script "duplicate", any additional tagging is unnecessary. --Túrelio (talk) 21:40, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

License review

Hi, could you please kindly review this upload: File:Piotr Trojan.jpg. Thank you:) AlicjaBalicja (talk) 13:21, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

My files

Hello Túrelio,

I have noticed your comments regarding the maps I created and uploaded, and I’d like to provide a detailed explanation of my position.

The maps I created reflect internationally recognized borders as established by the United Nations and supported by the majority of countries worldwide. My intent is to provide accurate and unbiased representations of geographic and political realities in line with international law, not to push any political agenda. Specifically: 1. Crimea: The territory of Crimea is internationally recognized as part of Ukraine. While it is currently occupied, this occupation is not legally recognized by the UN or the majority of states. 2. Unrecognized Entities (e.g., “DNR”, “LNR”, “Transnistria”, “Abkhazia”, “South Ossetia”): These regions are not recognized as independent states by most countries or international organizations. Representing them as separate entities on maps can mislead viewers and conflict with widely accepted geographic conventions. 3. My aim is to avoid presenting any politically controversial or unrecognized territorial claims as factually valid, which is consistent with Wikimedia Commons’ goal of neutrality and factual accuracy.

If there are concerns about the maps, I am open to discussing them in a constructive and collaborative way. I encourage a calm and respectful discussion instead of framing my work as “vandalism” or “POV pushing,” as such accusations are counterproductive and contrary to the spirit of Wikimedia’s collaborative community.

Should you have specific points of concern, I invite you to raise them either in a deletion request discussion or on the talk page of the map in question. I am happy to review and, if necessary, revise the maps based on a consensus reached through proper community dialogue.

I hope this explanation clarifies my intentions and the principles I followed when creating these maps. Thank you for your understanding, and I look forward to a constructive discussion on this matter. Salto Loco (talk) 08:51, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi Salto Loco,

it seems you have misinterpreted the notifications on your talkpage. Another user had tagged these images for speedy deletion. As some of them were still in use on other project-pages, I have converted the speedy-deletion-requests into a regular (slow) deletion-discussion. This was just a maintenance-edit. So far, I have no opinion on the rationale of the speedy-request. --Túrelio (talk) 14:37, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

January 2025

Hi, I would like to ask about the removal of the image I uploaded. Why was it flagged for copyright infringement, even though the source of the photo was mentioned in the description? As far as I know, government sources are public.

https://www.kemhan.go.id/2024/08/01/menhan-prabowo-melakukan-pertemuan-dengan-presiden-rusia-vladimir-putin-di-rusia.html Sayurasem (talk) 09:09, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi,

are you talking about File:Prabowo and Putin.jp? If yes, the source-site states "Hak Cipta © Kementerian Pertahanan Republik Indonesia", but not that its content is in the public domain. --Túrelio (talk) 14:32, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Air Mail Poster (19290383998).jpg

At the very least, the rationale is completely irrelevant: death date of author has no effect on copyright status of U.S. works from this era. Do you have even a basis to believe this was ever copyrighted? - Jmabel ! talk 18:37, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Well, as the painting is in this center of this poster, it is surely above COM:TOO and thereby copyrightable. IMO, the PD-SDASM-template is meaningless, as the museum is not the copyright-holder. If artist en:Melbourne Brindle created this work for the en:United States Postal Service, which is neither mentioned in the description nor in the Flickr-source, the copyright might (or not) have been transferred to the USPS. However, whether it then falls under PD-USGov is unclear to me. At least, I didn't find any USPS-specific PD-tag in Category:PD-USGov license tags. Assuming it was first published in the US, per File:PD-US table updated.svg its current copyright-status depends on whether it was published without notice and not renewed or with notice and renewed. In the 1st case, it would be in the PD, in the 2nd case it would still be in copyright (1940 +95 years). I'll put the image into a regular DR, so that all open questions can be discussed. --Túrelio (talk) 09:35, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Exactly. - Jmabel ! talk 16:56, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Category:All media needing categories as of 2024

I don't think this maintenance category qualifies to be deleted as a speedy. The user who tagged it is obviously not here to contribute effectively. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 12:07, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Restored. --Túrelio (talk) 17:26, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Anzeige von PDF

Hallo Túrelio,

ich habe ein PDF hochgeladenː Festschrift. Leider wird das nicht so angezeigt wie z.B. diese PDFː Jell-O.

Wie wird das Festschrift-PDF genauso dargestellt wie das PDF von Jell-O? Hat es mit der Pixelangabe zu tun? Kannst Du mir weiterhelfen?

Grüße und Danke, Harjawalski (talk) 18:37, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi Harjawalski,

scheint nun gelöst zu sein. Manchmal hilft in solchen Fällen auch einfaches Abwarten, weil der Renderer oft einige Zeit braucht. Allerdings wird in den Metadaten ein Name angezeigt. Schau mal ob dir das recht ist. --Túrelio (talk) 07:46, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio,

klasse ... danke, das passt so. Harjawalski (talk) 21:07, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Identified images in User:Túrelio/Disclaimers

The fourth-to-last unidentified photo looks like file:Olympic_Flame_Varese_10307511.jpg

The second-to-last unidentified photo is File:Laguna, parque nacional de Cuyabeno, Ecuador.jpg JayCubby (talk) 22:08, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. --Túrelio (talk) 07:43, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Advice

Hello, can you please help me conclude this discussion? Obviously, Mexico's freedom of panorama law allows these photos because the law says: VII. Reproduction, communication, and distribution by means of drawings, paintings, photographs, and audiovisual procedures of works that are visible from public places Aurelio Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 20:37, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi,

that's indeed not an easy case. Mexico's freedom of panorama exception is not in question. However, the consideration by the nominator is also legitimate. For the moment, I don't have a speedy solution. As the DR was opened just today, it might be the best to leave DR open for quite some time and hope that a number of informed users voice their opinions. I have a somewhat similar upload/case: File:StarWarsGraffitiViktoriaalleeAachen 8254.jpg. I can only assume that the mural-painter, who is known, obtained a permission for this derivative. --Túrelio (talk) 21:12, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you, Could you please then inform more informed users to discuss this issue? Aurelio Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 22:17, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Please. Aurelio Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 22:17, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

@Túrelio You gather the others informed users please? Aurelio Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 02:36, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Probably the best way to get informed users would be a neutral post on Commons:Village pump/Copyright calling attention to the case. - Jmabel ! talk 04:20, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

@Jmabel Could you please help me add it to that site? Aurelio Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 04:44, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Village_pump/Copyright&diff=prev&oldid=987594756. - Jmabel ! talk 05:03, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

@Jmabel Thank you. Aurelio Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 05:15, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

File deletion

RE: Deletion of File:Alice Da Silva Aguiar, Bebe King and Elsie Dot Stancombe.jpg

You deleted this file on the grounds that "It's unlikely that the Crown Prosecution Service or UK government own the copyright of these family photos", however the CPS could have easily requested to use these photos and distribute them under Open Government Licence v3.0. All original information on CPS webpages falls under Open Government Licence v3.0, with the exception of logos (see here) and when they do publish images they do not hold the copyright to, they make this clear (see here, where Merseyside Police are credited for the mugshot.) No such copyright disclaimer is left on the family photos, suggesting that they are also available under OGL 3.0. There is no reason to believe otherwise.

As such, I think this image should be restored. Macxcxz (talk) 22:04, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi,

while I understand that these images are of high encyclopedic value, the rationale by the original nominator (not me), appears to be sound. For example, in this report[7] from yesterday, the images are expressedly labeled as "family images". So, per the typical press/media-exception, they can be used/reproduced by media (and government) without being released under a free license. However, the usual media-exception is not valid for Commons and Wikipedia (except those that accept fair-use). --Túrelio (talk) 22:18, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

I do not really see what a news report crediting them as family photos has to do with their publishing by the CPS. As previously stated, all images published by the CPS, unless otherwise stated, fall under OGL 3.0. I was not aware that the deletion was nominated by another user, is there any place I can view this nomination, or more formally contest it? Macxcxz (talk) 22:25, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Sure, at Commons:Undeletion requests. --Túrelio (talk) 22:29, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you Macxcxz (talk) 22:33, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

TV6 logo

You deleted File:Tv 6 logga.png for copyvio. Why? It's clearly {{PD-textlogo}}. // Kakan spelar (talk) 22:33, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Well, per the statement on https://www.tv.nu/policy/anvandarvillkor, from where the logo was taken, they claim full intellectual property for images, design, etc. In addition, the file was claimed to be under {{cc-by-sa-4.0}}, which is clearly untrue, and a trademark-template was missing. However, per Commons:Threshold of originality#Sweden the logo might indeed be below copyrightability in Sweden; though I am unsure whether that is valid outside of Sweden. So, I will undelete the image and put it into a regular DR, which allows discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 09:23, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Talk

Assalamu Alaykum. I'm Bakelyazid8 in Algeria Bakelyazid8 (talk) 10:34, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

? --Túrelio (talk) 10:12, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

z.B. Restrepia

Guten Tag Túrelio,
könntest Du bitte ein Auge auf diese Diskussion [8] werfen.
Der User JopkeB zeigt großen Aktionismus, den ich in vielen Punkten nicht für zielführend für WP halte.
Beste Grüße. Orchi (talk) 16:43, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Duplicate deletion question

Hi, just wondering why you chose to delete the older version and retain the newer version for File:Anchorage White Raven 191984643 04.jpg and File:Anchorage White Raven 191984643 03.jpg? They should have been the same quality. It's no big deal, just wondering what I missed! (also, now the names in the Anchorage White Raven category don't neatly match up but even I have to admit that's a little nitpicky lol) GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 21:19, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi,

you are correct that we usually retain the older upload. However, in these cases the newer uploads had markedly higher resolution. So, after visually comparing the files, I choose to retain the newer ones. If the filenames don't fit, I can rename them. --Túrelio (talk) 07:38, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

CC 2.0 Images

Hi, sorry about the Lubezki and Tom Cross images from here https://www.flickr.com/photos/disneyabc/15999973623/in/photolist-2pMi6CK-rjJ9np-qnXJQV-rjJ9mH-rjERFS-qnS3Jc-EAWh81-rjJ9mc-EsNn8m-E5NtCK-DFPiBJ-RKgqAu-Et6gVJ-EcsSDd-EcqkQJ-Ecn1dU-Et6hpu-EDu31X-Et6gXs-boCmEE-boCmhS-fAKKSF-bBxfPx-boCmAW-boCmps-boCm27-boCmv9-bBxfGR-2pwePfP-2nburpz-2nbrUkT-2pwgZ1q-2pwfB82-2pwgpoQ-2pwgq3v-xZpNF-2pweNZP-2pwafEn-2pwgpp1-2pwgZ1A-2pwgYRN-2pwgpCN-2pwePmk-2pwfBtN-2pwePmq-2pwgq35-2pwafAE-2pweP96-2pwePuG-2pwePer. Were they deleted because I cropped them? Is cc 2.0 not allowed? Want to make sure i dont make the mistake again. thanks Ketlag (talk) 21:38, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi,

per our policy COM:L only works that are free for commercial use and for the creation of derivatives are allowed to be uploaded to Commons. Not all CC-licenses do allow this. The image in question is under a CC-BY-ND (ND = no derivatives) license, which is not allowed (as the only license) on Commons, the same as CC-BY-NC (NC = no commercial use). --Túrelio (talk) 07:35, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Got it. Thank you for the clarification! Ketlag (talk) 13:14, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

File:NSND Đặng Nhật Minh 2023.jpg

Please undelete this file per ticket #2024041210000728 (see cropped version). It was tagged for deletion by a global-locked LTA. Phương Linh (talk) 12:33, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:59, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Titration of iodine in salt

Hi Túrelio! @Fra.Ardini asked me (privately) why File:Titration of iodine in salt - adding salt in flask.jpg and File:Titration of iodine in salt - adding deionized water.jpg. I see that you marked them with no permission and they were later deleted by @Krd. I don't understand why you marked them as no permission. Fra.Ardini confirmed me that @Saleiodato, the uploader, is the photographer, as indicated in the file page, and I see no reason to doubt that. Jaqen (talk) 17:45, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Jaqen,

honestly, I don't remember why I had originally tagged them. So, I tried to find out. When I temp-restored the first image and looked at its metadata, I found that they credited "Laura Guida" as photographer and copyright-holder. The same was true for the 2nd image and for the other not deleted images of this series. Now I am quite sure that this was the reason to tag the images as "no permission", as this name is unsimilar to the uploader's account-name. If the uploader indeed is said Laura Guida, she could send an email to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org) stating that she is indeed the mentioned photographer. Then, OTRS can put a ticket on all images of the series. This would also prevent the same happening again in the future, when somebody else note the discrepency betwenn uploader and mentioned photographer. If she wants to do that, tell me, then I will undelete the 2 images.

In case, she is Laura Guida, but wasn't aware that her real name is shown in the metadata and objects to it, the images could either be deleted and then re-uploaded (with the name removed from the metadata) or she could re-upload the "cleaned" images (name removed from the metadata) over the existing images and thereafter the first version can be deleted or hidden. Nevertheless, even in this case it would be easiest to send the above mentioned confirmation to OTRS. --Túrelio (talk) 19:35, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

@Túrelio I didn't check the metadata! I've asked @Fra.Ardini: Laura Guida was the owner of the camera. She taught Saleiodato and others how to use it and let them take some photos, that they later uploaded. I've suggested him to create a template to explain this workshop thing and add it in the file pages. If you have no objections in the meanwhile I would undelete the images. Jaqen (talk) 15:52, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Sure. --Túrelio (talk) 18:08, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Done! --Jaqen (talk) 18:34, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the understanding and thank you @Jaqen: for helping me. I will provide a template for these uploads in order to avoid troubles. Thank you and bye. --Fra.Ardini (talk) 16:11, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Retrieve file

Hello, could you undelete the photo File:Camera car La Grande Vadrouille Retromobile 2010.jpg, please ? The author did finally put the right license (https://www.flickr.com/photos/alain-mercier/4310770445). Groupir ! (talk) 16:52, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Done. But, problem is that it is not accessible. So, the license-status cannot be checked. --Túrelio (talk) 17:25, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

I don't understand. I don't have any problem to see it on Flickr (https://www.flickr.com/photos/alain-mercier/4310770445). On my demand, the author put this file under license CC-BY-SA 2.0, alongside two other photos (https://www.flickr.com/photos/alain-mercier/4310804313 and https://www.flickr.com/photos/alain-mercier/4311509518). Groupir ! (talk) 10:30, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Well, when I go there I get a 403 and also the FlickrReview-Bot is not able to check the license. It seems the Flickr-account has changed the visibility, as initially (with the wrong license), it obviously was visible, per the FR-record. The reason may be that the Flickr-user doesn't really want to change the license for all Flickr-visitors. If that is the case, you can tell them that after our FlickrReview-Bot has recorded the compatible license (which takes only seconds), he may change back to restrictive license on Flickr.--Túrelio (talk) 10:45, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Ok I will talk to the author. Wait a few days. I hope this new problem will not bother him, it took a long time to finally get the right free license from him. Groupir ! (talk) 13:05, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

If my "suspicion" is correct, you could arrange a time with him and after he changed the file to "open", you can activate the Flickr-Review-But by yourself by removing the current FlickrR-record from the file and adding {{Flickreview}}. Usually it takes less than 5 minutes until the bot has reviewed the license on Flickr and added a record to the file on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 13:12, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

The file was deleted by another person. I'm still waiting for the answer of the author. It is so absurd, I can see it is under free license ! Groupir ! (talk) 06:09, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

The problem on Flickr may be that one needs to be logged-in (on Flickr). --Túrelio (talk) 10:35, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Finally I was able to log-in to Flickr and view the image and license. I've uploaded the highest available resolution and manually reviewed the license. If you want, you can tell the Flickr-user that he can, if he wants, switch the license on Flickr back to more restrictive. --Túrelio (talk) 10:42, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Great, finally ǃ Strangely, the author just said to me it did nothing special with the pictures on Flickr. As you did, I have uploaded the two other photos from Flick manually. Could you review their license, please : File:Camera car La Grande Vadrouille front clapperboard Retromobile 2010.jpg and File:Camera car La Grande Vadrouille rear Retromobile 2010.jpg 01.jpg. Groupir ! (talk) 22:35, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:30, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Thank you ! Groupir ! (talk) 13:48, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Request to undelete

Hi Túrelio, I saw that you "deleted" the below files as duplicate hence this is a request to undelete the following files:

• File:Tiffany at Sulwhasoo event on 29082024 (1).jpg
• File:Tiffany at Sulwhasoo event on 29082024 (2).jpg
• File:Tiffany at Sulwhasoo event on 29082024 (3).jpg
• File:Tiffany at Sulwhasoo event on 29082024 (4).jpg
• File:Tiffany at Sulwhasoo event on 29082024 (5).jpg
• File:Tiffany at Sulwhasoo event on 29082024 (6).jpg
• File:Tiffany at Sulwhasoo event on 29082024 (7).jpg
• File:Tiffany at Sulwhasoo event on 29082024 (8).jpg
• File:Tiffany at Sulwhasoo event on 29082024 (9).jpg
• File:Tiffany at Sulwhasoo event on 29082024 (10).jpg
• File:Tiffany at Sulwhasoo event on 29082024 (11).jpg
• File:Tiffany at Sulwhasoo event on 29082024 (12).jpg

It could have tagged as |other versions = using {{Extracted from}} in the summary box. Furthermore, {{CC-BY-2.0}} itself doesn't restrict transform in which my uploads were cropped version. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 20:02, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:46, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks you — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 20:24, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Metadata

You recently deleted File:Sister Paula Nielsen and Fluster the Dove.jpg, which I assume was something I brought over from enwiki using FileImporter. Could you check - who was the original uploader and/or what was the original filename? Thanks. DS (talk) 04:03, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

File-metadata mention Daniel Spiro as "artist"/author. The original upload-record mentions en:-user Primatepdx as author and "Newdove2.jpg" as the filename. --Túrelio (talk) 15:03, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

That wasn't a "personal photo from non-contributor". It was uploaded to enwiki for use in a biographical article that was deleted a few years later for being inadequately sourced.

I think the late Ms Nielsen actually might meet notability criteria; if I remake the article, I'll ask you to restore the image. DS (talk) 01:04, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Problem is that the metadata-base author/artistname "Daniel Spiro" doesn't fit to the uploader's account-name. So, it might be a copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 19:57, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello Turelio

why hasn't the image been deleted

• File:Eyüpspor_Logo.png
• File:Sunset in the Dubai Conservation Wildlife Reserve.jpg

🌸 Esther Rossini 💗 (☕Let's chat) 01:43, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Well, the 2nd one is in use and there is no compelling evidence for a copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 08:42, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Löschung von z.B. Category:February 2025 in Krefeld

Hallo,
gerade - beim Hochladen neuer Bilder aus dem Februar - gesehen, dass die Kategorie von Dir gelöscht wurde ;-)
Habe sie wieder neu angelegt.....
Bitte auch leere Kategorien unter "Category:Streets in Krefeld" nicht löschen, diese werden - nach und nach - mit (weiteren) Bildern gefüllt.
Danke + Gruß
Rudolfo42 (talk) 12:52, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi,

dann wäre es gut wenn du in diese (noch leeren) Kategorien oben einen kurzen Hinweis einfügst, dass sie in Bälde befüllt werden. --Túrelio (talk) 19:58, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Steve Christou Politician

Hi Turelio.

I noticed you deleted Steve Christou profile picture on his Wiki Page on December 9 claiming copyright from another page. I am the owner of the picture and am happy to provide proof of purchase receipt.

I kindly request that you reinstate the picture on the Wiki Page. Ancient Trojan (talk) 05:14, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi Ancient Trojan,

as you have no deleted uploads on your account, could you tell me which file you are talking about. As I usually perform hundreths of deletions per day, it's nearly impossible to keep track. The eventual removal from a Wikipedia-article is not performed by myself, but automatically by a bot after a file has been deleted on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 07:34, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Are you talking about File:Steve Christou politician.jpg? Well, that was deleted in last year. It had been uploaded by User:LyndseyHDouglas, who claimed it as own work and to be from July 2024. However, on Facebook the same shot had been uploadded already November 2023.[9] Now, who is really the photographer? And, if not the photographer, who holds the full copyright? --Túrelio (talk) 07:39, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi Turelio

I am the owner and hold the copyright. Can prove through purchase receipts. Lyndsey Douglas was given permission from myself to upload the image. 110.175.175.162 00:18, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi,

ok. The usual procedure for such cases is: send an email from your official email-address to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org in which you should first mention the filename of the image on Commons (File:Steve Christou politician.jpg), explain the copyright-status, your will to release it on Commons under the choosen free license (was: cc-by-sa-4.0) and eventually add evidence. Your email is treated confidentially by our OTRS-volunteers and is not published. An OTRS-volunteer will evaluate the copyright, eventually ask for more clarification (so, provide a point of possible contact) and, if approved, add an (approval-) ticket to the image. Do this as soon as possible. I'll conditionally undelete the image, but add a OTRS-pending tag. --Túrelio (talk) 09:02, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

I have just submitted the email as requested with proof of purchase Invoice and email.

Please reinstate in a timely manner.

Thank you Ancient Trojan (talk) 01:08, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

Request

Hello Túrelio! Can you delete File:Muhammadalimirza.png as it's a copyright violation. There is no such CC-BY licence at source, just Standard YouTube Licence. It's also uploaded by StanFuk, a blocked sockpuppet on Wikipedia. Ashiqiyya (talk) 21:41, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi Ashiqiyya,

thanks for notifying. However, the source-video is indeed under a CC-By license. Just click on "More" below the video-window on Youtube and you can see the license-tag. --Túrelio (talk) 09:25, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

Deletion of my own jpg

Hello, you cancelled speedy delete G7 of my own file Yarda Helešic.png. Could you please tell me, how should I correctly ask for deletion? Thank you, Yarda Helešic (talk) 18:24, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi, a G7-speedy can only be requested within 7 days of upload. This upload is 7 years old. You need to open a regular deletion-request. --Túrelio (talk) 19:26, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

Salam Necəsiz? Azərbaycanın Xalq Cumhuriyyətinin banisi Məhəmməd Əmin Rəsulzadənin vikiarxivinə yüklədiyim fotolar niyə silinib?

Şəkillər silinib.Vüsal Qərib (talk) 19:17, 9 February 2025 (UTC)Vüsal Qərib

Hi, please see your talkpage User talk:Vüsal Qərib. They were deleted because they are suspected to violate copyright. --Túrelio (talk) 19:30, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

Why have you deleted an image that is licensed under CC-BY-4.0?

I uploaded an image from Microsoft Learn to Commons a few days ago, but it was deleted by you a few hours ago. It is licensed under the CC-BY-4.0 according to https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/windows-itpro-docs/blob/public/LICENSE What is your intention? カペリートの夢 (talk) 05:36, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi,

well, the image had been copied from https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/application-security/application-control/user-account-control/, right? The terms-of-use on that page[10] do not mention any CC licensing. So, I don't know in what relation is the license-page, linked by you, to the uploaded screenshot. If you are truely convinced that it is under a free license, I can put the upload into a regular deletion-request, which allows for discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 07:51, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello. — Preceding unsigned comment added by カペリートの夢 (talk • contribs) 08:31, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Well, I didn't took it from MS Learn, no. I took it from a repo which is hosted on GitHub, meaning not here but here. So it is not appropriate to bring Microsoft Learn TOS, IMO.

In case you don't know, Microsoft Learn is open-source and vast majority of it is in official GitHub repositories, which is a host service for open-source projects. And looking at the dedicated repo, it says all the docs in the repo are explicitly licensed under the CC-BY-4.0 (and all the code in it are licensed under the MIT License as CC isn't really for code), both of which are permissive licenses and allow me to use/exploit/perform in anywhere with attribution.

I don't really think there's still room to discuss, will you upload it again, or should I? カペリートの夢 (talk) 08:26, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

As annoucned, I've undeleted the image and put it into a regular DR to allow for discussion. Here you are: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Consent.exe on the secure desktop.png. --Túrelio (talk) 08:53, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

File:Rinpa style ink-stone box.jpg

hello u forgot this one: File:Rinpa style ink-stone box (cropped).jpg. 4urEDqkeAtdyXbQ (talk) 15:17, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi, no, as the remaining one is 2-dimensional and thereby o.k. per PD-Art, as the depicted original work is PD since long. --Túrelio (talk) 19:35, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Rinpa style ink-stone box

Hello Túrelio, you recently deleted this image and I'm wondering if the reasons for deleting it also applies also to this one. I'm asking because the choice between this and other images for the en.wiki article "Yasuke" is currently the subject of an RfC, and the editors would like to know if they still have an "Option B" (Rinpa style ink-stone box) available. Thanks, Gitz6666 (talk) 23:31, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

I apologise. I just noticed that you've already answered the same question in the thread above. Gitz6666 (talk) 00:03, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio, I've re-added this image while correctly filing it under public domain. The owner of the depicted work passed away in the 16th century[11][12][13]. Since the picture isn't creative the derivative clause for non-2D art doesn't apply. Bladeandroid (talk) 03:34, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

I believe PD-old-100 is the right template for it. Bladeandroid (talk) 03:49, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Category:People associated with rail transport in Germany

Hallo! Do hast die Unterkategorien zu dieser Kategorie gelöscht mit der Begründung, dass diese nicht nützlich sind. Sie waren bis zu wenigen Minuten vor der Löschung auch nicht leer, was in der Verantwortung von User:Adamant1 liegt. gab es hierzu einen Konsens? Warum sollten wir diese Kategorien entfernen, wenn die Mutterkategorie auch so aufgebaut ist? Ich finde, so etwas sollte vorher diskutiert werden. Ping @Triplec85 als erfahrender Nutzer im deutschen Kategoriensystem. Lukas Beck (talk) 11:37, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi, ich habe sie wohl gelöscht, weil sie leer und entsprechend markiert waren, vermutlich durch den erwähnten Benutzer. Ob da vorher etwas einsortiert war, kann ich nicht sehen. Da es eine reine Wartungslöschung war, können sie gerne wiederhergestellt werden, wenn sie doch gebraucht werden. Wenn ich das machen soll, müsstest du sie mir nur auflisten. --Túrelio (talk) 13:50, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Just to respond since I was pinged. 1. It was discussed at Commons:Village_pump#Category:Categories_by_association and although I can't find it right now there was another discussion about the whole "associated with" thing a few months ago that had the same conclusion. There's also this bit in Commons:Categories "there should be one category per topic; multi-subject categories should be avoided. The category name should be unambiguous and not homonymous." Aside from being multi-subject, a category for people associated with transport (whatever that means) is rather ambiguous.

2. From what I remember, the only subcategory in Category:People associated with rail transport in Germany at the time was Category:People at train stations in Berlin, which is already in multiple sub-categories for people at train stations in Germany. Everyone at a train station in Germany is inherently "associated with rail transport in Germany." So the category was totally redundant. Maybe that's not the case with similar categories, but it clearly was with this one. --Adamant1 (talk) 13:46, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

@Túrelio: I don't think the categories should be restored given that this was already discussed multiple times and for the reasons I gave in my second point. I don't have a problem with L. Beck commenting on the village pump discussion and then the categories being restored if or when the consensus changes, but they are still ambiguous, redundant and go against the guideline for naming categories in the meantime. --Adamant1 (talk) 13:58, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Ich sollte erwarten, dass eine Mutterkategorie auf Bundesebene, welche nach wie vor existiert, auch weiterhin die Tochterkategorien auf Landesebene enthalten sollte. Diese existierten für die Bundesländer Berlin und Brandenburg. Andersherum sollte sicherlich erwartet werden, dass die Mutterkategorie der bereits gelöschten Tochterkategorien auch geleert und gelöscht werden sollte. Es ergibt keinen Sinn, die Kategorie auf Bundesebene zu behalten und auf Landesebene zu löschen. Lukas Beck (talk) 14:37, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

@L. Beck: Obviously context and how a category is being used matters. The category at the federal level makes a little more sense because it has actual categories for people in it that are probably associated with transport. To quote Themightyquill from a similar discussion "The use of "associated with" certainly has its place on commons, but we don't put people who've ridden in a truck or been run over by a truck in Category:People associated with trucks." I'd say the same applies here with putting images of people taking trains in a category for "people associated with rail transport." Whereas it makes a little more sense for someone like Category:Rüdiger Grube since he's the CEO of Deutsche Bahn. Although I'd much prefer there just be categories for CEOs of rail companies instead of creating millions of redundant "associated with" categories for every minor thing that happens to be related on here. Otherwise the federal level category should just be deleted as well. --Adamant1 (talk) 14:57, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Deletion requests

• File:Italo e Floriano Calvino.jpg: it is in a bad and incomplete format, and not necessary;
• File:Yamamoto Heikichi.jpg: it is an exact or scaled-down duplicate of File:Yamamoto Heikichi (1913).jpg;
• File:Kenkichi Tomimoto and his family, end of 1917.jpg: unused and implausible redirect (G2).

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 79.41.194.215 (talk) 11:54, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

First you need to open a regular deletion-request, as they were uploaded already in 2023. Problem is there is no replacement for this photography. --Túrelio (talk) 13:51, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Can you do the other two? 79.41.194.215 15:01, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

I-

i- am in shock i- am disgusted i- am scared Cyberwolf (talk) 16:56, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

? --Túrelio (talk) 20:20, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

The Csam I nominated…. Cyberwolf (talk) 13:26, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Deletion of CC photo

Hello, you deleted File:Delegate Michelle Maldonado, Virginia House of Delegates, 2024.jpg because of a "copyright violation," but the photo was licensed under a CC license that is permitted on Wikimedia Commons. You can see the original file here, with a CC-BY license. Why does this qualify for deletion? Packer1028 (talk) 02:40, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Ähem, for the deleted image, source=The Office of Del. Michelle Maldonado and author=Amanda Maglione. No Flickr-link had been provided. So, where is the evidence for the claimed CC-license? --Túrelio (talk) 08:22, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

The source is the Office of the Governor of Virginia, the author=Lori Massengill, and the CC license is CC-BY. Please review the link I provided. Packer1028 (talk) 12:59, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Here is the Flickr link I provided above: https://www.flickr.com/photos/gy74/53459489650/in/album-72177720313998100. I don't know why the photo was listed as being by the delegate's office, because the original photo (at least the one that I uploaded) came from this Flickr address. Would I be allowed to (re)upload this image from this address? Packer1028 (talk) 13:07, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Ähem, thee image under the last cited Flickr-link (showing a group of 3 persons) is completely different from the deleted image (a single shot). --Túrelio (talk) 14:23, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

It's a crop of that photo, or at least the one I submitted was. And again, it's licensed under CC-BY, meaning it's not a copyright violation. Unless someone switched photos or switched the attribution, this photo is acceptable. Packer1028 (talk) 22:33, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, but no. The delete image (File:Delegate Michelle Maldonado, Virginia House of Delegates, 2024.jpg), which was uploaded by User:Forbailey, is not a crop of https://www.flickr.com/photos/gy74/53459489650/in/album-72177720313998100. These are totally different images. For now the online-source of the deleted image is unknown, as it was not provided at upload. I did even a Google-search, which didn't find it elsewhere. --Túrelio (talk) 08:38, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Oh, that's very strange. I would have sworn that image was the one I uploaded. My sincere apologies for the confusion. Packer1028 (talk) 04:36, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Almost all maps are in the public domain

I happen to have User talk:Radom1967 on my watchlist, and noticed the deletion of this:

• File:Visualisation of Numbeo's Cost of Living Index by Country in 2023.jpg

I have no idea what license Radom1967 used for it. But many people do not know that nearly all maps are in the public domain. It doesn't matter what other license sources or users try to use. See Template:PD-map.

I googled and found this map which I assume is the map in question:

• https://www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/rankings_by_country.jsp?title=2023

I haven't studied whether the map is any good or not. That is a separate issue. --Timeshifter (talk) 06:07, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi,

uploader had put it under {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} AND provided https://www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/rankings_by_country.jsp as source. The latter is indeed not under a free license[14], as it has a NC-restriction. If you really want to "fight" about the general status of this map, I can put it into a regular DR. --Túrelio (talk) 08:27, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

No, I will take your word for it: "methodology is opaque and flawed. We should not be using this even without the copyright issues."

I am just trying to get the word out about {{PD-map}}, {{PD-chart}}, etc.. I have uploaded various maps and charts from the web to the Commons, and changed the license to those licenses. Because most maps and charts can't be restricted in their use. They are in the public domain regardless of how people try to restrict them.

There are a wealth of maps and charts out there that would be very useful in Wikipedia articles. And oftentimes much better than anything Wikimedia users can create fresh.

I have changed licenses on maps and charts already on the Commons too. To the PD ones. To get the word out that way too. And because we are not supposed to put restrictive licenses on images that are already in the public domain. --Timeshifter (talk) 09:54, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Just to get this right: the words of the deletion-rationale/reason are not from me, but the nominator. --Túrelio (talk) 13:07, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

OK, thanks for the clarification. I hope that in the future you and other admins will just substitute {{PD-map}} or {{PD-chart}} for any other license on a map or chart under deletion discussion. Maps and charts that do not qualify usually include other copyrightable things like photos, illustrations, diagrams, etc.. --Timeshifter (talk) 20:04, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

I'll try. Otherwise, remind me again. --Túrelio (talk) 14:24, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

{{Cities of Belarus}}

Hello! Could you help me fill out templates about cities in Belarus similar to Ukraine? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 08:27, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

File:Jimmy Carter and Margaret Thatcher (cropped).jpg

Hi Túrelio. Would you mind please deleting this file, which was derived from the previous version of Jimmy Carter and Margaret Thatcher.jpg that I uploaded (and you deleted)? I've discussed this with the user who cropped the image at my request (COM:GL/P#Cropping request) and they've voiced no objection. Thanks, ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 23:09, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 10:38, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Category:1861 maps of Pennsylvania

You deleted Category:1861 maps of Pennsylvania as "(incorrectly named) duplicate" but isn't the correct name 1861 maps of Pennsylvania? What other name would it be? Ricky81682 (talk) 10:02, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi, this rationale comes from the nominator User:Enyavar and was automatically adopted. Anyway, the now-deleted cat could be assumed as a sort of duplicate of Category:1860s maps of Pennsylvania to which the content had been moved. Of course, if a larger number of maps from 1861 occurs, the 1861-cat can easily be recreated. --Túrelio (talk) 10:42, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Turelio, please take care of this

Commons:Deletion requests/File:0582-01 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg, problematic revision deleted, please close this nomination. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 17:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

 Done.--Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Mother and Mother 1+2 album soundtrack covers

Hello! I was wondering why you deleted the covers for Mother and Mother 1+2 off of this platform, as both covers feature elements that do not meet the threshold for originality to be copyrighted. I'm not too familiar with COM:TOO Japan, but both covers seem like they would fit the criterium to be in the public domain. NintenBOUND (talk) 13:56, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I assumed that they might be over TOO of Japan. If you want to really discuss this, I can put them into a regular DR, which allows a discussion. However, for this you need to provide me the filename of the images. --Túrelio (talk) 14:52, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

The filenames of the images? What do you mean? NintenBOUND (talk) 14:18, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

@NintenBOUND I’m requesting the soundtrack covers (among others) to be undeleted. Unfortunately, that Grandmaster guy kept mass tagging so many images for speedy deletion. TzarN64 (talk) 01:45, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Category:Black and white postcards of Nantes speedy deletion

Hi. Can you delete the talk page to since I assume it's pointless now that the category doesn't exist? Thanks. Adamant1 (talk) 19:06, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 21:05, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Just del all files I requested to delete

Just del some files like 异体字 updated by me before but needed to be deleted right now.

I have marked all of them by {{SD}} template previously.

So don't undo again plz. 囍鵲 (talk) 18:47, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

We have a policy wrt deletion: Commons:Deletion policy. The files which I didn't delete, were wrongly tagged as duplicates without providing the target (i.e., the other files of which they were claimed to be a duplicate). Also, they can't simply be deleted per "wish of uploader" as they had been uploaded long time ago. --Túrelio (talk) 21:09, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Help me

Help please I want the image to display on my article and not necessarily on my draft MAHAMAT BORGOU HASSAN (talk) 21:33, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Hassan_bakhit_djamous.jpg MAHAMAT BORGOU HASSAN (talk) 21:36, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi, File:Hassan bakhit djamous.jpg has been deleted as unfree. --Túrelio (talk) 07:52, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

what should i do to make it help please. i want to see what i can do MAHAMAT BORGOU HASSAN (talk) 12:34, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Per our policy COM:L, only images that have been released under a free license by their author/creator can be uploaded to Commons. So, either you need to shoot the required image by yourself or you need to find one that has been verifiably been released under a Commons-compatible license. --Túrelio (talk) 13:01, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

can you delete the first one from the draft and leave the one from the article MAHAMAT BORGOU HASSAN (talk) 14:08, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

I have no idea what you are talking about. Here on Commons you have no remaining upload. --Túrelio (talk) 14:18, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Okay MAHAMAT BORGOU HASSAN (talk) 14:25, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

F7

Don't you think F7 on File:Wedding photo of Yamamoto and Reiko, 1918.jpg is out of order? It was a legit redirect after a duplicate file was cleaned off. _signed, Aafi ^(talk) 17:26, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Indeed, I didn't think much about the rationale, which was used by the one who tagged the file, User:かたうら. However, I checked for any existing uses of the redirect. --Túrelio (talk) 19:57, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Question

Hi. I know I just opened it, but could you do me a favor and close Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos associated with video as delete since the images were already deleted once as spam and reuploaded by the same user? It seems pointless to wait the whole seven days in an instance like this and I'm trying to clean up the category. Thanks. Adamant1 (talk) 06:41, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:53, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Undelete files

Hi, I've given my rationale in File:Toponim Surakarta.pdf and File:Kota Solo Selayang Pandang.pdf. Please check them again. Both of them should've used PD-IDGov instead of the other license (because I was bulk uploading) Bennylin (yes?) 09:19, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I've temp-undeleted the files. Please check thoroughly whether the PD-IDGov rationale is really applicable here. --Túrelio (talk) 09:24, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks! Bennylin (yes?) 12:39, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

"Redirecting to duplicate file"

Are you using a tool that automatically creates the redirect when you process duplicates, or are you manually creating the redirects and are just very fast?

If it's the former, what tool is it? The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:29, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi colleague, that is simply a subfunction of the usual {{Duplicate}}, that is activated when one clicks on "process duplicates". --Túrelio (talk) 19:33, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Ah, that would explain it. The duplicates I process are typically not actually tagged as duplicates. Thanks! The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:34, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Category:Airplanes in Poland

Hello. Why did you remove this category? It had content. ~~ Eurohunter (talk) 20:19, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi, when I deleted it, it had no content. No problem to restore it, if there is a good reason. --Túrelio (talk) 20:21, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

There was content with images but @Uli Elch: removed category from images. How to restore it? Eurohunter (talk) 16:28, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Now you need to fill it. --Túrelio (talk) 16:31, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Das zugrundeliegender Problem war, dass der Bearbeiter ganz vereinzelt (3 Stück) Kategorien des Schemas "Airplanes in xxx country" errichtete, mit einem einzigen oder ganz wenigen files füllte und diese wiederum aus den eigentlichen und längst etablierten Kategorien "Aircraft in xxx country" löschte, so dass ein völlig fragmentiertes Kategoriensystem entstand.

Entweder man macht so etwas konsequent und vollständig, statt ganz einzeln und zerrupft – oder man lässt es, statt mal eben das Kategoriesystem zu zerschießen und dann wieder so liegen zu lassen. Viele Grüße --Uli Elch (talk) 10:18, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Possible re-uploading

Hi. Is this a re-uploading of File:Sree Narayana Guru.jpg? 0x0a (talk) 12:13, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Sort of; the head is identical. The deleted one was in color/colorized, the new one in b/w. Due to its quality, I doubt that the new one is really from 1908, as claimed. --Túrelio (talk) 15:27, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

File:"I am Looking Forward to Dictating Peace to the United States in the White House of Washington." - NARA - 514556.jpg

If I recall correctly, that file is not an exact duplicate of File:"I am Looking Forward to Dictating Peace to the United States in the White House of Washington." - NARA - 514556.tif, in fact there is detail in the JPEG that is absent in the TIFF. If that is the case, could you consider undeleting it? JayCubby (talk) 13:36, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

After a visual re-check, both seem to be really identical. --Túrelio (talk) 07:46, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Regarding File:A_very_polite_looking_Swede.png

I have truly and honestly made that image. It is an accurate, heraldically hatched re-draw of the Impish Soyak Ears variant holding a wineglass. Swedish Win (talk) 05:50, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

I don't know about the background/history of that image. However, the nominating user found it here: https://knowyourmeme.com/photos/2575164-impjak . If you want to discuss this issue, I can put the image into a regular DR, which allows discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 07:45, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

alright Swedish Win (talk) 03:19, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Here you are: Commons:Deletion requests/File:A very polite looking Swede.png. --Túrelio (talk) 11:14, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Pete Jonas at Outside Lands 2021.png

Hi Túrelio. File:Pete Jonas at Outside Lands 2021.png is just a re-uploading of File:Pete Jonas Outside Lands.png which you deleted yesterday as a copyvio. This user orignally uoloaded the file locally to English Wikipedia as en:File:Pete Jonas performing at outside lands.png under a "CC-by-sa-4.0" license, sourced it to Instagram and attributed it to en:Pete Jonas. After the local file was tagged for speedy deletion per en:WP:F11, the user uploaded it too Commons as their "own work" under a "CC-zero" license. I don't know whether this user is just really misundersanding COM:L, COM:NETCOPYVIO and COM:Own work or whether they're intentionally trying to deceive, but all they needed to do was have the copyright holder (even if that was they themselves) send a consent email to VRT for verification. They've also uploaded two other photos from Instagram are almost certainly no their "own work" that I tagged as needing permission but most likely because I was assuming good faith at the time; however, after seeing what this user has done regarding this particular image, it seems unlikely that copyright holder consent will ever be forthcoming, and I probably should've tagged those files as copyvios instead. -- Marchjuly (talk) 19:55, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

You actually deleted this file while I was posting the above; so, thank you for that. Now, I'm not sure what to do about this user since they might just upload the file again under yet a different name. Do think adding {{End of copyvios}} to their user talk page will have any effect? FWIW, the other two file now have {{Permission received}} templates added to their pages; the emails were apparently insufficient, but at least someone does seem to have emailed VRT. Perhaps the email was also intended to cover this particular image as well. -- Marchjuly (talk) 19:59, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

After EC: I've notified the user already. It seems for 2 of his recent uploads something was sent to OTRS. Let's wait for their evaluation. --Túrelio (talk) 20:03, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

That's fine. Thanks again for taking a look at these and for adding the notification to the uploader's user talk page. FWIW, the same user also uploaded File:Positively Records.png as their own work under a cc-zero license, but that was fairly easy to cleanup; the photos are much harder to sort out. -- Marchjuly (talk) 20:09, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

They just uploaded the same file again as File:Pete Jonas Outside Lands 2021.png, but this time its sourced to Instagram and tagged with {{Permission pending}}. In addition, they've also uploaded File:The peters.png. They've not responded to any of the notifications left on their user talk page; so, it's not clear whether they now understand what's needed per COM:CONSENT or are just re-uploading files regardless of COM:L. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:27, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. For the moment let's just wait for the judgement of OTRS/VRT. --Túrelio (talk) 08:52, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Atarashiki-mura flag.png

File:Atarashiki-mura flag.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 19:27, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Please review some GODL files

Hi @Túrelio, you have helped me quite a few times with reviewing my uploads. I have got a backlog once again.

• File:Prime Minister of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi releases the Annual Report of the Indian Judiciary (2023-24).jpg +
• File:President's Bodyguard infront of the Rashtrapati Bhavan.jpg +
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi at Sri Arulmigu Ramanathaswamy Temple in Rameswaram (03).jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi paying homage to the martyrs at the National War Memorial on the occasion of 76th Republic Day.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi with CDS Chauhan & COAS Dwivedi paying homage to the martyrs at the National War Memorial.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi at Kartavya Path on the occasion of 76th Republic Day celebrations.jpg
• File:Indian Armed Forces Veterans Tableaux at the 76th Republic Day.jpg
• File:President of Bharat Smt. Droupadi Murmu riding The Royal Presidential Buggy.jpg
• File:President of Bharat Smt. Droupadi Murmu on her way to Parliament in the Royal Presidential Buggy.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi receives Emir of Qatar, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad AL Thani on his arrival in New Delhi.jpg
• File:Minister of External Affairs, Dr. Subrahmanyam Jaishankar & Prime Minister of Qatar, Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani exchange MoUs in New Delhi.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi takes holy dip at Triveni Sangam during Maha Kumbh 2025 in Prayagraj.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi taking holy dip at Triveni Sangam during Maha Kumbh 2025 in Prayagraj.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi takes holy dip at Triveni Sangam during Maha kumbh 2025 in Prayagraj.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi taking holy dip at Triveni Sangam during Maha kumbh 2025 in Prayagraj.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi offers prayers after taking holy dip at Triveni Sangam during Maha Kumbh 2025 in Prayagraj.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi performs Ganga Aarti at Triveni Sangam during Maha Kumbh 2025 in Prayagraj.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi praying after taking holy dip at Triveni Sangam during Maha Kumbh 2025 in Prayagraj.jpg

Once these are done most of my uploads till Feb 2025 will be reviewed. Thank you. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 08:35, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Sorry man, the list was messed up. I have got it fixed now. Removed the ones which were reviewed already. I am leaving some more from February here. Please do the needful per your comfort.

• File:Prime Minister of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi and President of France Mr. Emmanuel Macron jointly inaugurate the Indian Consulate in Marseille.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi and President of France Mr. Emmanuel Macron wave to the crowd.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi and President of France Mr. Emmanuel Macron waving to the crowd.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi with President of France, Mr. Emmanuel Macron.jpg
• File:President of France Mr. Emmanuel Macron sees off Prime Minister of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi at the airport.jpg
• File:President of France Mr. Emmanuel Macron sees off Prime Minister of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi on his departure from Marseille.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi arrives at Orly Airport in Paris, France.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi at Orly Airport in Paris, France.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi receives ceremonial Guard of Honour on his arrival at Orly airport.jpg
• File:President of France Mr. Emmanuel Macron welcomes Prime Minister of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi at the AI Action Summit in France.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi with Vice President of the United States, Mr. JD Vance.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi with Vice President of the United States Mr. JD Vance & Second Lady Mrs. Usha Vance.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi with Vice President of the United States Mr. JD Vance.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi with Vice President of the United States Mr. JD Vance & Second Lady Usha Vance.jpg

Thank you. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 19:12, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello @Túrelio just a gentle reminder. Will you be doing this? Shaan Sengupta^Talk 02:14, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

 Done.--Túrelio (talk) 14:37, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

You delete my page

Hi Túrelio, I am Sfsanchez72. You deleted my page. I am new in the wikipedia. If I have done something wrong, I apologize. Could you explain me what I have done wrong? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sfsanchez72 (talk • contribs) — Preceding undated comment was added at 03:25, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi Sfsanchez72, you don't need to apologize. It's not that you've hurt me. As shortly explained in the notifications on your talkpage User talk:Sfsanchez72, another user had tagged 2 of your uploads as potentional copyvios. The latter is not a legal judgement, but just means there is a suspicion that they might not be own work and might violate the copyright of someone else. In such cases, we usually act "overcautious" and delete such material, but can also easily undelete it, if the suspicion is proven wrong.

• 1) File:CALIFA DR3 poster.png looks like a scientific poster or screenshot, but claimed as own work by you. It carries a Credits:-line which mentions 2 name and a scientific group (CALIFA). Assuming, you might be the mentioned S.F. Sánchez, is all CALIFA work per law in the public domaine or, if not, is the any evidence that you co-author agree to release this image under the choosen CC-BY license?
• 2) File:Sebastian F. Sanchez.jpg seems to show Sebastian F. Sanchez. Again, assuming that is really you, the uploader. Did you really shoot this by yourself (selfie)? or did somebody elase shoot it? --Túrelio (talk) 14:23, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Asking for an impartial voice

Hello @Túrelio. This is the first time I'm doing this so I'm sorry if this is beyond your purview, but I'm looking for an impartial view on a topic under discussion regarding File:Flag of Portugal.svg. There's currently a contentious discussion going on that topic named "File outdated" which greatly needs an impartial juror, I believe I'm reaching the right user. I would be very much appreciated if you could voice your opinion there. Best regards, Oos88 (talk) 02:01, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi Oos88, sorry for my late reply, but I was ill for several days. Anyway, flags are really not my area of expertise. --Túrelio (talk) 14:27, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Advice requested

Hi, could you please have a look at File:VCM-Cover.jpg? It's an open-access journal and articles have a statement that they are published under a CC license, but it's not clear to me that this goes for the whole website. In any case, it's almost certainly not "own work". Thanks! Randykitty (talk) 13:13, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

I've put it into Commons:Deletion requests/File:VCM-Cover.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 14:08, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Level Editor

Hallo!

Sie haben mein Bild Level Editor im ursina engine Wiki gelöscht. Ich habe ein weiteres Bild eingefügt, hoffentlich nun mit richtigem Copyright, allerdings hat das Bild kein Copyright und es ist auch kein Videospiel. Was soll man beschreiben, damit es richtig ist? Jedenfalls können Sie sich nun anschauen, ob das jetzt richtig mit dem Copyright ist.

Viele Grüße Raphi-2Code (talk) 18:59, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Hallo Raphi,

der Screenshot File:LevelEditorFromTrailer.png wurde gelöscht, weil seine Quelle, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37vLHB5PRTw&t=25s, nicht unter einer freien Lizenz steht. Es gibt YT-Videos unter einer CC-Lizenz und solche unter der YT-Standardlizenz, die nicht frei ist und nicht den Lizenzregeln von Commons, COM:L, entspricht. Bei deinen neuen Upload fehlt zunächst mal eine vernünftige Quellenangabe, "other" ist nicht ausreichend. --Túrelio (talk) 13:59, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Allerdings ist es ja auch ein Screenshot des lvl editors und der ist unter Mit Lizens und zur Not frage ich halt den Entwickler ob es so passt, ist es dann ok? Raphi-2Code (talk) 20:05, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Und so wie ich Petter kenne stimmt er sicher zu Raphi-2Code (talk) 20:07, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

My dodge image

Hi sir, I noticed my image of my 1946 dodge that I literally took with my iphone was deleted from the "Dodge Custom" page because of copyright issues? Also, it was claimed to be on pintrest but the pintrest link you referenced is dead link and I never posted this car image on pinterest. Please let this image be on the wikipedia page. I love this car and want, for historical purposes for it to be seen on wiki. There is no copyright issues as it is my image I took and I can prove it to you if you need proof. A wiki robot appeared to delete it based off the accidential copyright violation of the image. Thank you very much for your understanding. Ri5009 (talk) 01:34, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I assume you are refering to File:1946 dodge deluxe business coupejpg.jpg. The pinterest-page, where another user found the image, is https://pt.pinterest.com/pin/297659856642387231/ and is still active. However, the image there has lower resolution than your upload. So, I will put the image in to regular DR which allows discussion and input from others. --Túrelio (talk) 13:53, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Since I am a newer user, may I ask what DR means? Also, whoever posted my image on pintrest (based on the link you provided) appears to be from somebody else. I did not give that person permission to post it on pinterest so I am hoping they will delete it. I will update on this. But yes, the image is of my car and would like it to remain on the "Dodge Custom" wiki page. Thank you very much for your understanding. Ri5009 (talk) 16:23, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

DR is short for deletion-request, which means a regular, not a speedy request. Here it is: Commons:Deletion requests/File:1946 dodge deluxe business coupejpg.jpg. Feel free to comment in it. --Túrelio (talk) 18:44, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Gay Valimont Page had Copyright Clearance

The Gay Valimont page (File:Gay_Valimont_ballotpedia_image.jpg) had complete clearance. The page had the word Ballotopedia in the file, but it had official clearance as of last night. Starlighsky (talk) 12:42, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Not sure what you mean by "clearance". On Commons, copyright is the most important aspect. At upload you had claimed it as own work. However, another user then found it to be taken from ballotpedia. Problem is ballotpedia material seems not to be under a Commons-compliant free license (COM:L). --Túrelio (talk) 13:44, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

I didn't post it. It was on the politician's campaign site. Ballotpedia, a site for reviewing politicians, is likely using the image. I was editing the article about the politician on Wikipedia and noticed that the image was deleted. The image was likely on Wikicommons by the politician or her staff. Starlighsky (talk) 23:49, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

It was uploaded by User:Clpcarissa. However, that doesn't change was is stated above. Just replace the "you" by the uploaders name. --Túrelio (talk) 06:47, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Не удаляйте файлы добавленные пользовалем suryan

Отправлено письмо о том, что Администрация vestilipetsk.ru даёт разрешение на использование пользователем suryano все файлы с сайта vestilipetsk.ru Redaktorlipetsk (talk) 07:59, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

I have no idea to which files you are refering. --Túrelio (talk) 08:28, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/file:%D0%A1%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD_%D0%90%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%8F%D0%BD_%D0%B2_%D0%9E%D0%B1%D1%89%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D0%BF%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B5.webp Redaktorlipetsk (talk) 12:13, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Сурен Акобян в Общественной палате.webp was taken from https://vestilipetsk.ru/v-obshhestvennoj-palate-goroda-lipecka-proshlo-obsuzhdenie-programmy-remont/ whereas the uploader had stated "Author=SurenAkobyan". The website states "При цитировании ссылка на VestiLipetsk.ru обязательна!" but the uploader did not mention the website. The website also states "© VESTILIPETSK.RU – Все права защищены" (= All rights reserved).

Now, if the owner of the copyright of the uploaded images has given the uploader the permission to use these images under a Commons-compliant free license, such as the choosen CC-Zero, this permission needs to be sent directly (not forwarded) to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (COM:VRT), which will evaluate the permission and eventually issue a ticket, which then can be used for all these uploads. --Túrelio (talk) 15:59, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

разрешение отправлено на указанную почту + сертификат и свидетельство о том, что доменное имя пренадлежит Сурену Акобяну Redaktorlipetsk (talk) 07:27, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Logo of Cpersian Agency.svg

Hi. Permission sender states there is no advertizing in this file. Please review the deletion. --Krd 05:24, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

File restored and put into a regular DR Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo of Cpersian Agency.svg. --Túrelio (talk) 07:22, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Dublicates

I see that you actively delete my contribution as dublicates or scaled files. I want to see what you deleted because I am sure that I upload different files and don't see any reason to delete so many pictures. Анастасия Львова^ru/en 07:40, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi, please provide the filenames of the files you are complaining about. As an admin I perform hundreths of deletion per day. --Túrelio (talk) 07:45, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Well, you can take a look into my contribution what you deleted, but as far as I see, File:Советский проспект, 115, Ульяновка, ЛО 05.jpg, File:Саблинский водопад и около 1 апреля 2025, 18.jpg, File:Саблинский водопад и около 1 апреля 2025, 13.jpg, File:Саблинский водопад и около 1 апреля 2025, 12.jpg (and some days ago was one more, but then I was just surprised, not worried, and cannot find it now). Анастасия Львова^ru/en 07:51, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

• File:Советский проспект, 115, Ульяновка, ЛО 05.jpg (del) -> File:Советский проспект, 115, Ульяновка, ЛО 03.jpg
• File:Саблинский водопад и около 1 апреля 2025, 18.jpg (del) -> File:Саблинский водопад и около 1 апреля 2025, 17.jpg
• File:Саблинский водопад и около 1 апреля 2025, 13.jpg (del) -> File:Саблинский водопад и около 1 апреля 2025, 10.jpg
• File:Саблинский водопад и около 1 апреля 2025, 12.jpg (del) -> File:Саблинский водопад и около 1 апреля 2025, 09.jpg

All 4 files had been duplicate-tagged by OptimusPrimeBot and then (by me) have been deleted and redirected to their duplicate-version, which were also uploaded by you. --Túrelio (talk) 08:19, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

So I want to see what you deleted because I am sure that I upload different files. The bot can be not right. Анастасия Львова^ru/en 08:31, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

The bot is just a program, which operates far more impartial than a human and just tags files, which are identical. The 4 names listed above, are the filenames of the files which have been deleted. --Túrelio (talk) 08:36, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Last weeks I regularly receive mistakes during uploading, and it can be a reason. Okay, so I will ask on the Undeletion requests page. Анастасия Львова^ru/en 08:40, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

I've temporarily undeleted the first file of the list, to the version before I deleted it: File:Советский проспект, 115, Ульяновка, ЛО 05.jpg. --Túrelio (talk)

File:Quân hàm.jpg

Please delete the redirect. "Quân hàm" (which means "Military rank" in English) is a common name, not specific and the file is not used, when I tagged for deletion. Phương Linh (talk) 09:34, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:47, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

Possible Uer Profile Deletion Mistake

Hi, I think you may have made a mistake deleting user Redideo. Please reinstate. Thank you. Redideo (talk) 22:09, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi, your userpage has been deleted as it was considered and tagged to be advertising. The purpose of userpages on Commons is to show/present your Commons-related interests/(language)abilities/etc. to other users, but not your business-affilition. It's not like a Facebook-profile. Personally I would say, the CV-like statements are acceptable, but the link to your company should be removed. --Túrelio (talk) 06:46, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

Copyright releted

Hello @Túrelio, I uploaded a photo (this one) from a site but it was deleted today for copyright violation but the website policy clearly states that the all photographs of that site are released under CCSA 4.0 then how is this a copyright violation ? (see) TheSlumPanda (talk) 19:05, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi TheSlumPanda,

the file had been taged by Shaan Sengupta due to "copyvio because All rights reserved. See website policy". The website, from which you had taken this image, offers a bit conflicting statements wrt copyright. There is the general not "All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025 Charan Singh Archives" and then the above cited lenghty statement. I will undelete the image and put it into a regular DR, which allows a discussion and statements of other users. There you are: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Charan Singh funeral procession at Delhi.jpg.--Túrelio (talk) 19:26, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks TheSlumPanda (talk) 04:18, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

And sir this image was taken my myself 6,7 years ago in my nokia mobile but this is flagged for deletion and last year I visited a temple in Rajasthan and clicked some picture in my father’s mobile 1, 2, 3 and these are also flagged for deletion. Thanks TheSlumPanda (talk) 04:28, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

I have no control over what files other users tag for (assumed) problems. The 1st one seems unproblematic to me. However, the metadata shown for this file, are not the original camera-data. If you have shot this image with a digital camera or a camera-phone, why did you replace the original camera-data? Could you please upload the original file.

The other 3 images are a different issue: they show works of art, which might still be in copyright. The photos were obviously taken indoors, so, freedom-of-panorama exception does not apply (as the 3rd one is a painting, FoP wouldn't apply anyway). You wrote "author unknown". Does this refer to the photo or to the artwork? In the latter case, we really do need information about when these specific works of art were created in order to evaluate whether they are still in copyright. --Túrelio (talk) 06:59, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

In 1st , i first of all don't have much knowledge about the meta data but i think it may be deleted either due to because i have cropped it because in original picture there are two persons (if you need then i will show it to you).

And for the next 3 photos i used “author unknown” because i don't have information about the person whose art is this and it is not about the photo because that was taken by me. Also as per India copyright rules freedom of panorama is applicable on 1st and 2nd one because these are 3D architecture.

Secondly if i am not wrong freedom of panorma is applicable on arts which are placed in public places and in this case temple is purely a public place where anyone can visit anytime free of cost. Thanks TheSlumPanda (talk) 07:29, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

Request to restore a file

Hi Túrelio, you recently deleted File:উইকিপিডিয়া ১৯তম প্রতিষ্ঠাবার্ষিকীর লোগো.svg (logo for 19th Anniversary of Bengali Wikipedia) as Exact or scaled-down duplicate of File:উইকিপিডিয়া ১৭তম প্রতিষ্ঠাবার্ষিকীর লোগো.svg (logo for 17th Anniversary of Bengali Wikipedia) and then redirected 19th Anniversary logo to File:উইকিপিডিয়া ১৭তম প্রতিষ্ঠাবার্ষিকীর লোগো.svg (17th Anniversary logo). Because of this wmbd:আড্ডা:বাংলা_উইকিপিডিয়া_দিবস_উদযাপন,_২০২৩#চিত্রশালা is showing incorrect logo (it is showing 17th Anniversary logo instead of 19th Anniversary logo)

Even though both file looks same (we reused the design), i can assure you, the text isn't same. Please delete the reditect and restore File:উইকিপিডিয়া ১৯তম প্রতিষ্ঠাবার্ষিকীর লোগো.svg. Thanks. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 00:12, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:31, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Category:Toto Wolff in 2014

Hello. Do not remove such categories. It's now a lot of work to do it all again. Eurohunter (talk) 20:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

Wow, this deletion happened in 2021! Apart from that, it could easily be undeleted, if justified, with 1 click by any admin. --Túrelio (talk) 06:54, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Mal ein kleines Dankeschön für einen der fleissigsten Admins. Wohl bekomms. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 20:26, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Redirects

Sorry, für die Mehrarbeit der redirects. Bei diesen Transfer ist so manches leider scheif gegangen. Beginnend von den Flickr User, die die Fotos doppelt hochgeladen und dann in zwei Alben vermischt haben. Versucht habe ich es mit dem Flickypedia, das mir auf einmal mit dem Link ein palästinensisches Album angezeigt hat und ich dann mit Flickr2Commons weitergemacht habe und da aber die doppelten nicht gefiltert bekam. Hier bekam ich wieder immer öfter die emptyfiles Fehlermeldung - sodass auch da doppelt gemoppelt werden musste. Das mit den doppelten wird bei Flickypedia noch schlechter, da ich ja die Namen selbst vergeben muss und da dann eine Überprüfung praktisch nicht stattfindet. Außerdem halte ich es für eine wesentliche Mehrarbeit mit dem neuen Programm. Also derzeit beide Programme eher ein Rückschritt als Fortschritt. aber nochmals danke und sorry. --lg -- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 09:36, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Recovering File:Albuquerque_THE_MOVIE's_Youtube_Thumbnail.png

Hello, please recover the File above, Ryan Krzak himself has stated that it has no copyright protection and it is free to use here: https://imgur.com/a/lrhEsMp SinclairUkiri (talk) 09:42, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi,

I am not really convinced that this dialogue is sufficient evidence. I think this will go through our regular permission-procedure via VRT. Iw ill temp-undelete the image and put it into a regular DR, which gives you enough time to start a permission-request to the author. --Túrelio (talk) 10:36, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

There we are: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Albuquerque THE MOVIE's Youtube Thumbnail.png. Here is a template, which you can use to ask the author either for a confirmation of the copyright-free status or of a Commons-compliant free license (such as CC-BY, CC-BY-SA or CC-Zero) for the image: Commons:Email templates#Email message template for release of rights to a file. --Túrelio (talk) 10:40, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Wiki Tobias Bonhoeffer

Dear, regarding the picture of Tobias Bonhoeffer, which has been deleted due to copyricht violation. It is exactely the opposite! The picture of Tobias was shot in our institute (www.bi.mpg.de) and the copyright holder is Julia Kuhl (https://www.bi.mpg.de/staff/115500). The Leopoldina is using the picture and now everybody thinks that they have the copyricht. Could you please update the page of Tobias Bonhoeffer, including the picture, thanks, S. Schewinefüße (talk) 10:12, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi Schewinefüße,

es geht um File:Porträt TB.jpg., ja? Wenn Julia Kuhl das Foto geschossen hat, warum hast du dann deinen Benutzernamen als Autor angegeben? Du klingst jetzt auch nicht so als wärest du selbst Frau Kuhl.

In einem solchen Fall ist die übliche Prozedur, dass der Urheber oder Rechteinhaber per Email eine Bestätigung der Urheberschaft (Vorlage: Commons:E-Mail-Vorlagen#Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber)) und der gewählten freien Lizenz an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org sendet. Unsere OTRS-volunteers vergeben dann ein sog. Ticket, fragen u.U. auch mal nach und bestätigen im Idealfall die Freigabe. Der Schriftverkehr wird vertraulich behandelt; ich werde davon nichts zu sehen bekommen. Frau Kuhl sollte in ihrer Bestätigung auch angeben, ob und wie sie als Autorin genannt werden möchte oder ob nur die MPG genannt werden soll. --Túrelio (talk) 10:26, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

OK, danke für die Antwort. Ist alles kompliziert, das geht über die Leitung der Kommunikationsabteilung des MPIs. Julia Kuhl und ich sind auch Mitarb. in der Kommunikationsabteilung.

Ich habe es weitergegeben, wird erledigt. Schewinefüße (talk) 20:47, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi,

der Unterschied im Vergleich zu einer normalen Presse-Anfrage ist halt, dass wir bei Mediendateien auf Commons den Anspruch erheben: die dürfen frei verwendet werden (wenn man sich an die Lizenzbedingungen hält). Ein solcher Anspruch verlangt natürlich eine peniblere Überprüfung, um zu vermeiden dass legitime Rechte des Rechteinhabers verletzt werden. --Túrelio (talk) 08:59, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Category:Streetlights of the former GDR

Hallo @Túrelio, danke für das Löschen! Entschuldige bitte mein schlechtes Englisch. Ich bin jetzt leicht verwirrt. Warum habe ich eine Warnung bekommen und Du hast die Kategorie jetzt, wie von mir gewünscht, gelöscht? Viele Grüße Molgreen (talk) 15:46, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi Molgreen, zunächst einmal: Jeff, der dir diese "warning" geschickt hat, ist ist zwar durchaus ein fleissiger Benutzer, aber kein Admin. Insbesondere sein letzter Satz ist völlig überzogen. Man wird nicht gesperrt weil man einen LA (engl. DR) falsch formattiert hat. Richtig ist gleichwohl, dass falsch formattierte Admin-Aufträge (LAs, speedies, usw.) natürlich zusätzliche Arbeit machen, was man möglichst vermeiden sollte, zumindest wenn man es besser weiß. Wenn du eine Kategorie gelöscht haben willst, z.B. weil sie leer ist oder du dich bei der Erstellung vertippt hast, dann klicke auf Bearbeiten und füge einfach {{speedy|1=<Grund>}} ein. Statt <Grund> schreibe halt C2 (oder: empty) oder vertippt (oder: wrongly created). Frohe Ostern! --Túrelio (talk) 16:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio, herzlichen Dank für Deine Erläuterungen. Ich werde mich bemühen, das nächste Mal daran zu denken. (Im konkreten Fall habe ich erst sehr spät bemerkt, dass ich die Kategorie hätte anders schreiben sollen . . .) Dir auch schöne Ostern! Viele Grüße Molgreen (talk) 16:15, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

File:YUKI_OSAKI_PORTRAIT_(Nov_2024).jpg

Hello @Túrelio, I uploaded a photo ([15]) from a site but it was deleted for copyright violation. This file is marked CC BY-SA 4.0 on Internet sites. I would like you to review the file. --Sendagaya428 (talk) 06:33, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Restored. --Túrelio (talk) 09:55, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Photo of the trip of Blinken to the Holy see in 2024

Hello Turelio, I would like to import from Flickr, photos of the trip of Blinken to the Holy See in 2024. It seems that the photo was already on commons but deleted by you. The photo are always on flickr with free licence, can you confirm me that i can import them again ? (This album [16], one example of your deletion [17]. Olivier LPB (talk) 14:04, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi, as it was deleted because "uploader requested deletion", you can surely re-upload it. Only try to avoid using the 100% identical filename, as the system then might recognize the former upload. --Túrelio (talk) 14:11, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

more redirects to delete

Hello! You can look here for new redirects to delete (there's more then 50 under the link provided there). 203.57.51.188 18:47, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Uploads to review

Hello @Túrelio hope you are doing well. I am back with a request for you to review my uploads. With these the log till March 2025 will be finished.

• File:Prime Minister of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi with Director of National Intelligence Ms. Tulsi Gabbard.jpg
• File:President Donald Trump presents Prime Minister Narendra Modi his book "Our Journey Together".jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi meets Elon Musk's kids.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi with Head of DOGE, Mr. Elon Musk.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi with Tesla CEO, Mr. Elon Musk.jpg
• File:Vivek Ramaswamy, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, 2025.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi performs Pooja at Shree Somnath Mandir.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi praying at Shree Somnath Mandir.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi in Mukhwa, Uttarakhand.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi in Mukhwa.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi visits Mukhwa, Uttarakhand.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi waving.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi gifts Gangajal to President of Mauritius, Mr. Dharambeer Gokhool.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi gifts Makhana to President of Mauritius, Mr. Dharambeer Gokhool.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi presents OCI card to President of Mauritius, Mr. Dharambeer Gokhool.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi with Prime Minister of Mauritius, Mr. Navin Ramgoolam pay homage to Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi and Prime Minister of New Zealand, Mr. Christopher Luxon.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi with Prime Minister of New Zealand, Mr. Christopher Luxon.jpg
• File:Defence Minister, Shri Rajnath Singh with Director of the National Intelligence, Ms. Tulsi Gabbard.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi and Lex Fridman greet each other.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi meets Lex Fridman.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi in a podcast with Lex Fridman.jpg
• File:Director of National Intelligence, Ms. Tulsi Gabbard gifts Tulsi Mala to Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi in a bilateral meeting with Director of National Intelligence, Ms. Tulsi Gabbard.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi with Director of National Intelligence, Ms. Tulsi Gabbard.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi gifts Gangajal to Director of National Intelligence, Ms. Tulsi Gabbard.jpg
• File:Shri Kiren Rijiju with Shri Vijender Gupta.jpg
  • File:Shri Vijender Gupta, Speaker of the Delhi Legislative Assembly.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi at Dr. Hedgewar Smruti Smarak, Nagpur.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi at Dr. Hedgewar Smruti Mandir in Nagpur.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi pays floral tribute to RSS founder Dr. Keshav Baliram Hedgewar at Smruti Mandir.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi pays floral tribute at Dr. Keshav Baliram Hedgewar Smruti Mandir, Nagpur.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi at foundation stone laying ceremony of Madhav Netralaya Premium Centre at Nagpur.jpg

Thank you. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 08:34, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 10:55, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Deleting an image I JUST flagged

Hello, is it OK to delete files which have just been flagged as possible copyright violations? Is it decent to the author, to whom I've just written to his/her page and asked him/her to disprove the copyvio by writing to a now-nonexisting page? Why don't we wait a few days before we delete? Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 12:25, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi Vojtěch, honestly I don't understand your complaint. You have copyvio-tagged (i.e. speedy) File:Podliský mlýn.jpg, which is sourced to a site stating "(c) 2015 - Národní památkový ústav, všechna práva vyhrazena"[18]. Sure, tagging a file as copyvio on Commons is not a sound legal judgement, which usually would require a judge or court decision, but just a suspicion or probability of copyvio. Anyway, people outside of Wikimedia-projects might be exposed to litigation when re-using such an image, if the claimed free license is indeed invalid. On the other hand, if its legitimacy is been shown/proven after upload, an erroneously deleted file on Commons can be undeleted by just 2 clicks. Therefore, it's justified and is our long-standing practise, to err on the side of caution (see also COM:PRP).

As the "tagger" you have other options than copyvio-speedy: "no-permission" would have been justified in this case, as the uploader has indeed provided the source (not falsely claimed as own work), which however seems not to support the claimed CC-license. A less suitable option in this case would have been a regular DR, which usually remains open for a number of days. --Túrelio (talk) 12:50, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Question

Hi. Would it be possible for you to temporarily grant me the review right so I can review some files that I'm importing from Flickr? I guess they are licensed as PDM 1.0 on their end but are actually PD-old. I can't add the license unless I'm a reviewer though. Thanks. Adamant1 (talk) 20:04, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi, Commons:Reviewer has no information about temporary reviewer-permission. Anyway, for how long or for approx. how many files, you would like to have this permission? (As it's already night in my timezone, I'll be offline from now for ca. 10 hours) --Túrelio (talk) 20:23, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Uuuhhh, A couple thousand? I can always just do it the normal way. I just didn't want the files to get deleted before I have time to go through them. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:50, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

@Adamant1, I have now temporarily granted you reviewer-status for your upload-campaign of PDM 1.0-files from Flickr for exactly 1 week from now. Please use this right only for the mentioned type of files. If the upload-campaign last longer, contact me. --Túrelio (talk) 10:49, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

OK. Thanks. It's much appreciated. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:55, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

!!!

"Hello, I see you have deleted an image that I recently uploaded: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:VE171217_%D9%85%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%86_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%BA%D9%88%D8%AB%D9%8A_%D9%85%D9%86_%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%AE%D9%84_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D8%AC%D9%86.jpg

Please could you explain why and how it can be undeleted? I was authorised by the International Campaign to Free Marwan Barghouti, which owns this image, to release it under the license described. The image is online already because we have previously made it available to some news websites." Kh.98 (talk) 14:51, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi,

the image has been deleted as it was copyvio-suspected after it had been found prepublished on algalile.com, see the notification on your talkpage. You had claimed it as own work, but now you say that it came from the "International Campaign to Free Marwan Barghouti". If said campaign really owns the copyright, they need to confirm the choosen free license to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . Please go to Commons:قوالب_البريد_الإلكتروني#Email_message_template_for_release_of_rights_to_a_file or Commons:Email_templates#Email_message_template_for_release_of_rights_to_a_file, copy the text in the gray rectangle, enter the filename (or complete URL) of the image, the name of the choosen license, and send it to the campaign organization. If they agree, their legal representative should sign and date the permission and send it directly (no forwarding) to the above mentioned address. The email will be treated confidentionally and not published. --Túrelio (talk) 07:05, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Sock of User:Jhon J. Espinoza T.?

Hi Turelio, by comparing what they upload, is Andrea Zillmann (talk · contribs) a sock puppet? 0x0a (talk) 12:37, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

I noticed that some of Jhon's uploads were overwritten by Andrea Zillmann. I wonder if they are the same? 0x0a (talk) 10:34, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Deletions with wrongful reasons

Next time you decide to speedy delete images as File:Leona e Chacha-001 (20271093718).jpg, File:Leona e Chacha-002 (20432900006).jpg and File:Leona e Chacha-003 (20459113025).jpg, as personal images uploaded with "Reason : CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors" (i was notified as the uploader with around 4 207 457 edits, so i ask when i will be upgraded to contibutor. Will it be at 5 millions contributions?) when this same images depict brazilian actress en:Leona Cavalli and en:José Rubens Chachá, when this were clearly not personal photos, but photos of the 100th presentation of theathre play Frida Y Diego in Teatro J. Safra. And this is a media covered theatre play. Said that, i reuploaded them. Tm (talk) 17:06, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Also, this image File:Leona e Chacha (20271113758).jpg. Tm (talk) 17:11, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi,

wrt user-group: AFAIK there is no user-group "contributor". Do you eventually mean "confirmed user"? However, you are actually in group "Autoconfirmed users".

wrt deletions: the reason why user:Hjart had tagged File:Leona e Chacha (20271113758).jpg etc. for speedy deletion, was probably that the desription and filename just said "Leona e Chacha", which may well suggest "friends" and that it was in the Category:Unidentified people. I admit that I likely didn't look at the uploading account (yours); otherwise I might have contacted you first. So, no problem with re-uploading. I have amended the file-descriptions for the full names of the depicted. --Túrelio (talk) 07:31, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

c:file:Кирьянов,_Игорь_Константинович1.jpg

The photo was taken in 2015, and it appeared on the website identified (www.koob.ru/kiryanov_i_k/) as its source much later. There is little original content on the website, the text is borrowed from Russian Wikipedia. Pavel Alikin (talk) 10:58, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Restored. --Túrelio (talk) 18:58, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

?

Diff for context — Why? I'am the uploader. Is there a specific provision that I am not aware of that states that AI-generated images cannot be removed by the uploader themselves? Fazoffic (talk) 09:23, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi,

no, this applies to all types of media. As uploader you can request deletion (even without providing a reason) within 7 days after upload, provided the image is not in use. Your image was uploaded in 2023 and is in use and therefore does not qualify for G7-speedy. However, you can propose deletion using a regular ("slow") deletion-request. --Túrelio (talk) 10:25, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

I see... thanks for telling me about that. Fazoffic (talk) 10:46, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Deletion of an ingame picture for Beyond All Reason

Hello, I would like to inquire what led to the belief that this picture violated any copyright?

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Beyond_All_Reason_80_player_game_screenshot.webp

It is literally an in-game screenshot made by me, in a game I develop, which is running on a opensource GPL Engine. Hard to imagine a less IP-violating thing.

PtaQQ (talk) 11:23, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi, the image had been copyvio-tagged by another user. The visual appearance and the filename clearly suggested to me that it's just another screenshot who somebody took from a computer/video game. As such games are usually copyrighted, such screenshots violate the copyright of the developer/company. If you are really the official developer of the game itself and also the creator of the contained "artistic" elements (such as the ones shown in the screenshot), please send a corresponding statement to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). Your email to OTRS will not be published and can only be accessed by our OTRS-volunteers, who will then issue a ticket and add it to the image. --Túrelio (talk) 12:13, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

URV

Bei File:Barockkrippe, Abtei- und Kuratiekirche Mariä Opferung (Frauenchiemsee) Geburt Christi Ansicht 35.jpg, aber es gibt noch mehr bei Category:Große Barockkrippe Frauenwörth von Erzbistum München. --AxelHH (talk) 19:21, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

z.B. File:Barockkrippe, Abtei- und Kuratiekirche Mariä Opferung (Frauenchiemsee) Zug der Könige 29.jpg und dies. --AxelHH (talk) 19:25, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. --Túrelio (talk) 19:29, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio, zu diesem Fall wollte ich mich auch eben kurz zu Wort melden. Das sind nicht nur einzelne Bilder, das ist geradezu ein Fass ohne Boden. Du hattest ja schon einige moniert; ich habe gerade noch einige weitere gefunden, aber das ist noch lange nicht alles.

Der Nutzer hat praktischerweise bei seinen Uploads wohl immer die Quelle dazugeschrieben, und stichprobenartig kann ich bei den mit "own work" beschrifteten tatsächlich keine www-Quellen finden. Insofern kann man sich wohl auf die beschränken, wo er es selber dazugeschrieben hat. Aber selbst das ist schon ein ganzer Berg, und es sind noch längst nicht alle als Copyvio markiert. Muss man die alle einzeln machen, oder gibt's da irgendein beschleunigtes Verfahren?

Es sind außerdem eine ganze Reihe Bilder dabei, die er von anderen Commons-Nutzern nochmal hochgeladen hat (z.B. das hier). Lizenzrechtlich vermutlich unproblematisch, aber ist das so das Vorgehen der Wahl?

Auf seiner Commons-Disk. scheint sich der Nutzer ja einsichtig zu zeigen und den Löschungen zuzustimmen - hoffen wir mal, dass da jetzt nichts mehr nachkommt. --2003:C0:8F42:EB00:6539:CC:DD7C:2E71 06:57, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Please restore File:1-10 Scale Battle Ship YAMATO , 1-10 戦艦大和 - panoramio (1).jpg

Can you restore this image while a discussion is ongoing? Thanks! Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 18:24, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Done by my colleague Yann. --Túrelio (talk) 20:02, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Category:Gülər Əhmədova

Hallo Túrelio, erst einmal danke für deine viele Hilfe beim Löschen von Kategorien und Dateien usw.
Könntest du bei Gelegenheit diese Kategorie wiederherstellen? Sie ist nicht mehr leer. Darüber bin ich gerade gestolpert wegen einer defekten Weiterleitung. Ich kann kein Aserbaidschanisch und kenne die Person nicht, daher weiß ich nicht, welche Kategorien in diese Kat passen könnten.

Die Category:Gular Ahmadova wurde von Yann gelöscht und ist wahrscheinlich eine Weiterleitung wegen der Verschiebung von dort, sie sollte dann auch wiederhergestellt werden. (For Yann: This is especially about restoring Category:Gülər Əhmədova, not empty anymore, and redirect Category:Gular Ahmadova.)

Ich finde nur die defekte, existierende Category:Gular Ahmedova. Dort steht aber bei der Verschiebung, sie sei falsch geschrieben, darum wurde sie verschoben nach Category:Gular Ahmadova. Wegen der ähnlichen Buchstaben sieht das plausibel aus. Ich schlage vor, die beiden gelöschten wiederherzustellen und die defekte als Falschschreibung (bad name) mit Link auf Category:Gülər Əhmədova zu löschen, sobald diese wiederhergestellt ist. Danke und beste Grüße —176.1.0.227 17:32, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Ich habe noch mindestens 2 andere Kategorien gefunden, die wiederhergestellt werden sollten und als leer gelöscht worden sind. Die beiden hat Billinghurst am 25. Mai 2024 gelöscht, also vor 1 Jahr, aber der war schon seit 9 Monaten nicht mehr hier aktiv, wie ich zufällig sah. Daher wird er wohl kaum bald etwas wiederherstellen. Einerseits ist das Category:Files uploaded by NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh/Flickr/All-Pro Reels/NCAA 2021 - Maryland vs. Kent State (9/25/21), sie enthält nun 72 Dateien. Andererseits Category:Files uploaded by NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh/Flickr/All-Pro Reels/NFL 2020 - Playoffs - Washington vs. Buccaneers, sie enthält nun 55 Dateien. Vermutlich sind beide irgendwann im letzten Jahr befüllt worden, ich habe nicht nachgesehen. Beide sind auf der Seite User:YiFeiBot/WantedCategories gelistet und auf beide zeigen defekte Weiterleitungen, die auch durchs Wiederherstellen repariert würden. Insgesamt gibt es auf der Seite User:YiFeiBot/WantedCategories 13 Kategorien, die mit "Files uploaded by NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh“ beginnen und jeweils mindestens 55 und max. 528 “members“ (Dateien oder was immer) enthalten. Eventuell alles als leer gelöschte Kats, evtl. sollten die alle wiederhergestellt werden. Vielleicht dort mal durchklicken. Danke sehr. Oder soll ich das lieber auf Commons:Undeletion requests/de anfragen? —176.1.0.227 18:05, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi,

Category:Gülər Əhmədova, Category:Files uploaded by NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh/Flickr/All-Pro Reels/NCAA 2021 - Maryland vs. Kent State (9/25/21) und Category:Files uploaded by NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh/Flickr/All-Pro Reels/NFL 2020 - Playoffs - Washington vs. Buccaneers wieder hergestellt. --Túrelio (talk) 19:59, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Danke. Category:Gular Ahmadova habe ich als Weiterleitung neu angelegt und die mit der Falschschreibung hat nun ein SD-Tag. Vielleicht schaue ich mir auch noch mal die anderen dieser gewünschten Kats an. —176.1.16.253 22:22, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Clarification on Jackie Elward photo deletion

Hi Túrelio, I saw that the image File:Jackie_Elward.jpg was deleted as a copyright violation citing the Bohemian article. I’d like to clarify that the image is not owned by the Bohemian, nor was it taken by a photographer employed by them. The photo was taken by someone I know personally who has given permission for its use, and I had full rights to release it under the CC-BY-SA 4.0 license. Could the deletion be reviewed? I’d be happy to provide further documentation if needed. Thanks for your time! Mundele665 (talk) 04:11, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi Mundele665,

in such cases the best way to document a sound permission, would be that you ask Mr. James Kirk do confirm the choosen free license per email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . His mail will not be published and can be accessed only by our VRT-volunteers, who are bound by an obligation of confidentiality. He could either send an informal email mentioning the image (either filename or full URL), his authorship and the license. Or you could prepare for him a more formal declaration by using the text in the square on Commons:Email templates#Email message template for release of rights to a file, which you need to supplement by the filename or URL of the image. He would then need to send this declaration from his official/business email-address to the above mentioned address. --Túrelio (talk) 10:58, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Individual maps by state by year deletion

Why are you deleting all the maps by state for specific years? Has there been a consensus to delete Category:1954 maps of Kansas when this map goes in there? I count at least 18 separate years where individual Sanborn maps of Kansas have been deleted with no place to find them. Category:1923 maps of Kansas, Category:1922 maps of Kansas and others are obviously not duplicates of their decade category. Every map at Category:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Leavenworth, Leavenworth County, Kansas is now missing if you look within the Kansas map structure. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:23, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

I see that it was Enyavar (talk · contribs) that is removing the maps from each category and then listing them for deletion under the claim that the maps are being merged into the decade ones while not merging the categories. My apologies. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:54, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Yes. These cadastral plans are depicting towns and not an entire US state. Per the principle with old maps, that the correct location is more important to categorize than the incidental year/month/day of publishing, I re-structured the "old maps of Kansas" by county depicted. To take the example of Shawnee County: all maps depicting just that county are now collected under Category:Old maps of Shawnee County, Kansas. Right now, I don't think that subcategorizing old maps of Topeka by more detailed timespans needs to be done.

To elaborate on "incidental year": For the idea of pinpointing maps by time instead of location, please compare this 1796 map from London, published in the US in 1802, and re-printed until at least 1811. Or Category:Johnson's and Colton's maps of Washington, D.C. (1855-1867). The production cycles got shorter over time, but it was not until the late 20th century that we were able to produce maps that are not outdated by the time of publishing. --Enyavar (talk) 09:23, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Wrongful deletion and motivation

You deleted the multiple-years-old Category:Educational organizations of Italy as (incorrectly named) duplicate of the just-created Category:Educational organizations in Italy. Besides them not meaning the same thing ("of Italy" included Italian organizations abroad, eg. Category:Scuola Italiana Arturo Dell'Oro and other Category:Italian international schools, which are not "in Italy"), you also violated the guidelines. You should have just moved the older category keeping its page history. Please, restore it and fix your mistake. Daniele Fisichella 06:22, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Restored. Please discuss the cat-system issues with the editor who had tagged the cat for deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 07:39, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. That editor appears to be currently blocked (again), but I left a message on their talk page anyway. Daniele Fisichella 10:02, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Images from Serbian Wikipedia deleted

I recently noticed some images on the Serbian Wikipedia that could have been a copyright violation. However, the uploader claimed that the original photographer gave them permission, both in an edit summary and on the Copyright page of the Serbian Village pump. Now, I don't disbelieve them, because they listed the source of the images. Someone violating copyright intentionally would list the source as their own work, and someone violating it unintentionally definitely wouldn't say the author had given them permission personally, twice. This is why I brought this up on the Village pump: if I had been sure the images were violating copyright, I'd have deleted them myself!

So, why delete the images? And how did you even find them? Seriously, they were being used on one page and not even on a Wikipedia in a well-known language! LukaSpace (talk) 14:42, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi @LukaSpace, could you please list the filenames of these images. --Túrelio (talk) 07:26, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Undelete AlanMacmasters hoax image?

Hey!: You once deleted that image (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alan MacMasters circa end of 19th century.jpg) for being unused and uploaded as a hoax without educational purpose. However, we now have educational purpose in the form of documenting this hoax itself (e.g. w:Alan MacMasters hoax). The uploader of the hoax image was its creator [19], and they uploaded under the public domain. Is there any more reason for the image to remain deleted? Aaron Liu (talk) 18:18, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

@Aaron Liu. Undeleted. Please correct the categories of that image. --Túrelio (talk) 07:28, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Looks like @Yann deleted it again. I guess that was because the external link to this section which would've explained Template:Them why did not render as a link for some reason. Aaron Liu (talk) 14:45, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Just notify him about this thread. --Túrelio (talk) 15:12, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

OK, undeleted again. Yann (talk) 16:06, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

@Aaron Liu: You removed the source [20], please fix that. Thanks, Yann (talk) 16:53, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:49, 19 May 2025 (UTC). As this is a photoshopped hoax image it wasn't from the museum mentioned either. Aaron Liu (talk) 16:58, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

@Aaron Liu: Yes, but we still need a source, whatever it is. Yann (talk) 17:02, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Did the edit that I linked not add a source? Aaron Liu (talk) 17:05, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Yes, that's fine. We cross edited each others. Yann (talk) 17:36, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

All photos by Agratsa

You reviewed a few photos uploaded by Agratsa (talk · contribs) a few years ago, and deemed them not copyvios (or at least that they couldn't be proven to be so). Looking at the user's uploads, I would say that they all carry the hallmarks of copyvio - many have already been deleted and the remainder from 2020 or so all look like Youtube stills. I do not see any evidence of this person actually taking photos. But that's a gut feeling, and not enough to go by.

More recently, however, they've posted blatant copyvios from the Bangkok Motor Show. Photos taken November 28 (the day before the show opened to the public) with three different cameras, clearly professional photos of which the only one I spent time looking for was already published elsewhere. The Zeekr photos even contain this text in the EXIF data:

Author WATTANAPONG PLYMAT Copyright holder AOUNPHOTO - Wattanapong was definitely there.

The uploader has never communicated about the various deletion requests; I find them highly suspect and I would like to request all of their uploads removed. Any thoughts? mr.choppers (talk)^-en- 03:47, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

I've started to check their recent uploads. --Túrelio (talk) 08:02, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

GODL images to review

Hello @Túrelio, I am back with another batch of my GODL-India uploads. These are all till date.

• File:The New Pamban Bridge.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi lays a wreath to Indian soldiers at the Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF) Memorial in Colombo.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi laying a wreath to Indian soldiers at the Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF) Memorial in Colombo.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi in Ramanathaswamy Temple in Rameswaram.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi in Ramanathaswamy Temple in Rameswaram.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi with Crown Prince of Dubai, Sheikh Hamdan bin Mohammed Al Maktoum.jpg
• File:Shri Amit Shah at the occasion of the 345th death anniversary of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj in Raigad.jpg
  • File:Shri Amit Shah in Raigad.jpg
• File:Shri Sukhbir Singh Sandhu, Election Commissioner of India.jpg <-- this one is missing a parameter, so the link to the source doesn't work
• File:The Minister of Defence, Shri Rajnath Singh meets CDS Gen Anil Chauhan, COAS Gen Upendra Dwivedi, Naval Chief Admiral Dinesh K Tripathi, Air Chief Marshal AP Singh and Defence Secretary, Rajesh Kumar Singh.jpg
• File:President of Bharat, Smt Droupadi Murmu with Shri Rambhadracharya.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi welcomes VP JD Vance and his family to 7, LKM.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi welcomes VP JD Vance and his family to his residence 7, LKM.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi with VP JD Vance, SLOTUS Usha Vance and their children.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi with VP JD Vance and his family at 7, LKM.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi with US VP JD Vance and his family at 7, LKM.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat, Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi with Second Lady Usha Vance and her kids at 7, LKM.jpg
• File:Prime Minister of Bharat Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi with VP JD Vance and his family at 7, Lok Kalyan Marg.jpg
• File:President of Bharat, Smt. Droupadi Murmu presents the Padma Bhushan Award to Shri S. Ajith Kumar at Rashtrapati Bhavan.jpg
  • File:Shri Ajith Kumar.jpg
• File:President of Bharat, Smt. Droupadi Murmu presents the Padma Bhushan Award to Shri Nandamuri Balakrishna at the Rashtrapati Bhavan.jpg
• File:President of Bharat, Smt. Droupadi Murmu presents the Padma Bhushan Award to Shri PR Sreejesh at the Rashtrapati Bhavan.jpg
• File:President of Bharat, Smt. Droupadi Murmu presents the Padma Shri Award to Shri Ravi Chandran Ashwin at the Rashtrapati Bhavan.jpg
• File:President of Bharat, Smt. Droupadi Murmu presents the Padma Bhushan Award to Shri Shekhar Kapur at the Rashtrapati Bhavan.jpg
  • File:Shri Shekhar Kapur.jpg
• File:The Minister of External Affairs, Dr. Subrahmanyam Jaishankar meets the President of the Republic of Angola, Mr. Joao Manuel Goncalves Lourenco.jpg
  • File:The Minister of External Affairs, Dr. Subrahmanyam Jaishankar.jpg
• File:The Minister of Defence, Shri Rajnath Singh.jpg
• File:The Minister of Defence, Shri Rajnath Singh addressing the brave Indian Army soldiers at Badami Bagh Cantt in Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, Bharat.jpg
• File:NCC expedition team successfully scales Mount Everest.jpg

Thank you in advance. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 11:43, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

 Done, except the one missing a parameter. --Túrelio (talk) 19:12, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

Yup, bcoz it was released via a press release and not gallery. So using the ID-PIB won't work. I have given both the required links now. Maybe that would do. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 01:03, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Undeletion request

Hi. Could you undelete the files at

• File:COD Celebrates the Class of 2025 (54541948649).jpg
• File:COD Celebrates the Class of 2025 (54542105675).jpg

Thanks! -- DaxServer (talk) 08:02, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Sure. But do you have the true source? The source-entries were invalid and a short search on that Flickr-account didn't yield a hit. --Túrelio (talk) 08:18, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

I believe the Flickr user has disabled/deleted/hidden the photos. In the album https://www.flickr.com/photos/codnewsroom/albums/72177720326350612/, the photos now are at 200, but when I did the transfer using Flickr2Commons-ng, there were atleast 251 looking at the category I put them in Category:College of DuPage Class of 2025.

I'd rather prefer them to go to a DR rather than speedy deletion as to whether they should be accepted to be here or be deleted, following my explanation. Thanks for restoring them. -- DaxServer (talk) 09:49, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

As there is no record of a compatible license, they cannot stay. You might contact the photographer via Flickr and ask them to confirm the choosen free license for the two images directly to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 10:59, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

That’s very unfortunate, please go ahead and delete them. I’ll check the category for the rest of those missing the Flickr review and tag them for deletion, once I’m back at the computer! DaxServerOnMobile (talk) 12:00, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

File:FRIDA KAHLO - Portrait of Cristina, My Sister.jpg

Could you please explain this deletion? As long the private collection is outsite Mexico, the 100 anni post mortem are not of importance. It is a strange imagination, that mexican law should also be valid in other countries. Marcus Cyron (talk) 00:40, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Sure. Frida Kahlo was a Mexican and died in 1954. Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Mexico#General, Mexican copyright currently lasts for 100 years pma. Though the Mexican gov repeatedly extended the copyright terms (Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Mexico#Term extensions), the extension to 100 years pma happened (2003) when Kahlo's copyright was still valid per the former conditions (75 years pma). Wrt to URAA, on the URAA date (1996-01-01), the Copyright Act of 1982 was applicable (50 years pma) and Kahlo's copyright still valid (see Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Mexico#Term extensions). As per COM:L, Commons requires that uploads are free (or freely licensed) in the United States and in the source country of the work. For the yesterday deleted reproductions (File:FRIDA KAHLO - Portrait of Cristina, My Sister.jpg, File:The Suicide of Dorothy Hale (1939) von Frida Kahlo. (Der Suizid der Dorothy Hale); Öl auf Hartfaser mit bemaltem Holzrahmen, 59,7 × 49,5 cm.jpg, File:The Suicide of Dorothy Hale (1939) von Frida Kahlo. (Der Suizid der Dorothy Hale); Öl auf Hartfaser mit bemaltem Holzrahmen, 59,7 × 49,5 cm Detail 3.jpg, File:The Suicide of Dorothy Hale (1939) by Frida Kahlo.jpg, File:The Suicide of Dorothy Hale (1939) von Frida Kahlo. (Der Suizid der Dorothy Hale); Öl auf Hartfaser mit bemaltem Holzrahmen, 59,7 × 49,5 cm Detail 1.jpg, File:The Suicide of Dorothy Hale (1939) von Frida Kahlo. (Der Suizid der Dorothy Hale); Öl auf Hartfaser mit bemaltem Holzrahmen, 59,7 × 49,5 cm Detail 2.jpg) of her paintings, freedom-of-panorama (Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Mexico#Freedom of panorama) is unlikely applicable.

See also de:Diskussion:Frida Kahlo.

However, due to the relevance of Kahlo, the case might be discussed in a regular DR to allow for more opinions, if desired. --Túrelio (talk) 06:58, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Yes, I think too, this should be discussed in a regular DR. I don't think, that the 100 years PM of Mexico count outside the country. Marcus Cyron (talk) 12:49, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

@Marcus Cyron, there we are: Commons:Deletion requests/File:FRIDA KAHLO - Portrait of Cristina, My Sister.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 18:45, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

File:The_Future_I_Saw_Chinese_Edition_私が見た未来_完全版.jpg

I had uploaded this in good faith given the 4.0 Creative Commons license on the Chinese Wikipedia & included the relevant link. Confusingly the reason given for deletion takes us to the https://www.otakupt.com/manga/manga-the-future-i-saw-causa-comocao-no-asia-sobre-possivel-terremoto/ , which seems a non sequitur...? (And who is Hyju?) Kencf0618 (talk) 13:57, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi, the :zh-page, from where you took this image, seems to show (I don't read Chinese) a fair-use rationale, i.e. meaning the image is not free, and it does not carry a CC-license. Hyju is the editor, who found this hit and tagged your file accordingly. Fair-use material is allowed on a few wikipedias, but not on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 14:35, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

OK, thanks. If that's the case I simply mistook the licensing. Kencf0618 (talk) 14:46, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Undeletion request File:Portrait_Julien_Soulier.jpg

I did an undeletion request after setting up proper licensing documentation. I am not sure what is the correct process to ask for undeletion (the julien soulier page is my first wikipedia / wikimedia contribution)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&action=edit&section=new#File:Portrait_Julien_Soulier.jpg_undeletion_request

I think you are the person who asked for the deletion for copyvio. I will copy the undeletion request here:

Although I had permission by the subject (Julien Soulier) to upload on wikimedia a picture of him made available on the press page of his website ( https://juliensoulier.tv/contact/site-presse ) and that the image was always used by media and press alike as a free press image (including the URLs flagged as possible copyright violations to delete the file)

I reached out to Julien Soulier when the file was deleted for copyright violation and told him that the image was missing documentation from the original author (Victor MÉRIEL-BUSSY). While everyone could already use this image freely for years, proper documentation has now been made available on the press page of his website

Direct link to the document : https://juliensoulier.tv/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Photograph_Ownership_Attestation_Victor-MERIEL-BUSSY.pdf Rsepierre (talk) 23:05, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi, while you choose a formally incorrect way for undeletion (proper place is Commons:UDR), I undeleted the image anyway, as the permission now looks fine. --Túrelio (talk) 07:38, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Undeletion request

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:McFarland_Publishing_Communication_-_Harris_M._Lentz_III_Bad_Source.jpg

hi, you said this is image does not have consent from the other party, yet in the chain they ask to be used as proof? The Watcher5292 (talk) 06:26, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi, it wasn't me who "said", but the editor, who tagged this image. Anyway, we are usually very cautious to publish email-correspondences in order not to violate privacy or personality rights. Surest way would be if Mrs. Siena Ritter could send a permission to publish this correspondce directly to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (COM:VRT). If you prefer a discussion, I can temp-undelete the file and put through a regular DR. Though I am not familiar with the background of this issue, I wonder if the whole issue (especially wrt the wikipedia article) wouldn't be better handled by the :en support-team. --Túrelio (talk) 07:31, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Question

Could you explain why you have deleted File:Teleios.png that have the legit commons license by-nc-nd ? YanikB (talk) 09:21, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Sure. Per our policy COM:L ,only CC-BY, CC-BY-SA and CC-Zero are acceptable CC licenses, CC..NC and CC..ND are not. --Túrelio (talk) 10:50, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Then we should remove it from {{Template:Cc-by-sa-4.0_or_cc-by-nc-4.0}} template.--YanikB (talk) 12:05, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Ok. I hadn't this strange template present, though it's legitimate, but also misleading. Our policy says that uploaded media-files have to be under at least one Commons-compatible free license. If you use this template, which offers the content under both licenses (!), it means that a licensee can use it for non-commercial purposes and then has no share-alike obligation (for derivatives), whereas if a licensee wants to use it for a potentially commercial purpose, they need to follow the share-alike obligation (SA component of the CC license). But this template does not mean that a licensor could simply pick only the nc-license from than double-license-template. --Túrelio (talk) 13:02, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Got it. thx YanikB (talk) 13:15, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Commons:AI generated media

Hi, I think it would be useful to keep a redirect. What do you think? Best, Yann (talk) 12:02, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

 Restored. --Túrelio (talk) 12:54, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Requesting a file overwrite.

Hi. I was wondering if you could overwrite the file File:President Donald Trump Participates in a St. Patrick's Day Reception with the Taoiseach of Ireland.webm as it was uploaded two months earlier with the one File:President Trump Participates in a St. Patrick's Day Reception with the Taoiseach of Ireland.webm, and then start a deletion request for the latter (based off the comment from here https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:President_Trump_Participates_in_a_St._Patrick%27s_Day_Reception_with_the_Taoiseach_of_Ireland.webm&oldid=1039364236). Thank you very much. RandomUserGuy1738 (talk) 13:53, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Ähem. So, this one File:President Donald Trump Participates in a St. Patrick's Day Reception with the Taoiseach of Ireland.webm shall be overwritten with this one File:President Trump Participates in a St. Patrick's Day Reception with the Taoiseach of Ireland.webm, right? And thereafter File:President Trump Participates in a St. Patrick's Day Reception with the Taoiseach of Ireland.webm shall be requested for deletion? --Túrelio (talk) 19:39, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Makarij at monastery in Verhoturje, 1909.jpg

Hi, you have recently deleted File:Makarij 09.jpg, File:Makarij at monastery in Verhoturje, 1909.jpg and File:Makarij monk.jpg. These file were previously requested for renaming multiple times by User:Ikumir (see his talk page). User:Ziv and I have declined the requests multiple times because there were no valid reasons for renaming stated according to Commons:File renaming. Now, User:Ikumir has uploaded exact duplicates of these files under File:Makarij in the Aktai farmstead.jpg, File:Makarij and Rasputin, 1916.jpg, File:Monk Makarij at his cell, 1910s.jpg, File:Makarij at his cell.jpg. This is a clear and inacceptable behavior of User:Ikumir to get around unsuccessful renaming requests. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 14:31, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

"Makarij at monastery in Verhoturje, 1909" is wrong: the correct description is what I've done. Don't delete it. Ikumir (talk) 14:36, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Hallo @Chem Sim 2001. Merci fürs erwähnen. Túrelio babelt übrigens auch deutsch wie wir beide. Mich erinnert das Ganze gerade an die Vorgehensweise des Users mit dem File:Napoleon (cadetto).jpg und weiteren Files. Das war eine ähnliche Geschichte. Bitte mal prüfen. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 15:26, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Name ist falsch, aber ich kann jetzt grad nicht weiter schauen. Auf Arbeit… זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 15:28, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Sorry dass ich die Vorgeschichte offenbar übersehen habe. Ich war heute eine Weile offline, jetzt auch wieder und werde mich später am Abend daran setzen und das ganze rückgängig machen. Wenn ich euch richtig verstehe, besteht ja mehrheitlicher Konsens dass die "alten" Dateinamen eigentlich in Ordnung waren. --Túrelio (talk) 17:29, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi Turelio, kein Problem und vielen Dank fürs Kümmern. Sowohl User:Ziv als auch ich haben unabhängig voneinander die Umbenennung der Dateien kurz nacheinander gemäß COM:FR abgelehnt, hauptsächlich wegen Criterion 1. Ca. 1 Minute, nachdem wir die Anfrage abgelehnt haben, hatte der User die gleiche Anfrage wieder gestellt, ohne Änderungen in der Begründung oder des Dateinamens vorzunehmen. Das Ganze ging dann bestimmt 3-4 Mal so und auch meine Nachricht auf seiner Diskussionsseite scheint nichts gebracht zu haben. Schließlich hat er sich einfach dazu entschieden, Duplikate der Dateien hochzuladen und die bereits seit Jahren etablierten Bilder als redundante Kopien zu markieren. Gruß, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 17:42, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

So, jetzt ist alles wieder wie vorher. --Túrelio (talk) 20:25, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Ich hab da mit zwei Bilder geholfen, ich hoffe es ist in Ordnung? Was ich mittags noch hinauswollte. Mich erinnerte dies stark an User:Pal-lon-cin. File:Quai de l'Horloge (Breguet).jpg hier war es ähnlich und auch der Nutzer hat dann aus Trotz, nur weil wir seine Umbenennenungsvorlschäge nicht genehmigen wollten, die Bilder dann unter dem gewünschten Namen nochmals hochgeladen. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 20:42, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Ah, Danke. Ich habe die "falschen" Duplikate inzwischen (dupe-)gelöscht. Da auf Commons so viel zu löschen ansteht, darunter manchmal auch hunderte bis tausende Duplikate/Tag, besteht leider ein gewisses "Mißbrauchs"risiko. Es ist sicher ratsam den hier betroffenen Benutzer etwas im Auge zu behalten. --Túrelio (talk) 21:44, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Vielen Dank, Túrelio, es scheint aber so, als ob der Nutzer keine Ruhe gibt, er nominiert jetzt deine Weiterleitungen immer wieder zur Schnelllöschung, siehe File:Makarij at his cell.jpg oder File:Makarij's chickens.jpg, obwohl sie bereits von User:Auntof6 abgelehnt wurden. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 06:22, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Edit: Scheint jetzt aber geklärt zu sein ... Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 09:19, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

z.K. Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ikumir זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 20:13, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Nun unter Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/GMatteotti. --Túrelio (talk) 06:46, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Conseil d'arrondissement.svg

Hi, nice to meet you

I saw you made the page "File:Conseil d'arrondissement 14.svg" redirect to "File:Conseil d'arrondissement.svg", but i would need it to delete "File:Conseil d'arrondissement.svg" and make "File:Conseil d'arrondissement 14.svg" the main article, or if it is simpler, delete "File:Conseil d'arrondissement 14.svg" and rename "File:Conseil d'arrondissement.svg" to "File:Conseil d'arrondissement 14.svg.

You see I made a mistake by creating "File:Conseil d'arrondissement.svg" and, as I'm not very familiar with commons yet, I created a duplicate instead of renaming it.

The thing is, as I work on the french muncipal election on Wikipedia fr, I've created many versions of "Conseil d'arrondissement.svg" such as Conseil d'arrondissement 24.svg or Conseil d'arrondissement 36.svg. Therefore, "File:Conseil d'arrondissement.svg" is a to generic name, but I can't rename it since the page already exist. So could you do something about it?

P.S.: Please forgive me for any error I could I've made, as you can guess, I'm french and English is not my native language, please feel free to ask for clarification if've been unclear on anything Niivlem (talk) 07:37, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Ok. I hope I've understood you correctly. So, I have redirected (and thereafter deleted) File:Conseil d'arrondissement.svg to File:Conseil d'arrondissement 14.svg. Now, File:Conseil d'arrondissement.svg does no longer exist. --Túrelio (talk) 19:32, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you very much Niivlem (talk) 20:20, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Stop deleting my photos

Those links you've shared doesn't own those photos, I owned those photos! I bought it from the original photographers Cecile77777 (talk) 09:08, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Stop writing "my photos". You are not the original photographer. Anyway, I've replied on your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 09:19, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Del noms

Hello Túrelio, weren't the following, Section 2(c)(iii) in COM:FOP India#2D artworks..?
[21], [22]
--Gpkp (talk) 12:23, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi Gpkp,

sure. However, the advertising poster/banners are likely not permanently installed and thereby missing the 2nd condition for FoP. --Túrelio (talk) 12:42, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

ok thank you Túrelio. --Gpkp (talk) 15:56, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Goa-pre-liberation-stamps.jpg

Hi Túrelio, the above file (that you have deleted) showed stamps published in Portuguese India. The question is which copyright rule applies, whether Portugal or India. I think India should apply, because the place of publication (Goa) is in India. If so, according to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/India#Stamps {{PD-India}} should apply. Maybe you want to reconsider your deletion. Thank you for your attention. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 08:45, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi Robert, here you are: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Goa-pre-liberation-stamps.jpg. This allows a discussion about your point. --Túrelio (talk) 10:37, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 11:55, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Discussion at COM:AN/U#User:Salmaci123

 You are invited to join the discussion at COM:AN/U#User:Salmaci123. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:08, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio. Since you deleted the re-uploaded File:Tarick Salmaci in action on The Contender Season 1.jpg, I'm wondering if you mind taking a look at File:Tarick Salmaci pro debut w Muhammad Ali (1992).jpg (File:Muhammad Ali pro debut.jpg, File:Tarick Salmaci and Muhammad Ali.jpg, and File:Tarick Salmaci with Muhammad Ali.jpg), File:Tarick Salmaci at age 10 with Muhammad Ali.jpg (File:Tarick Salmaci and Muhammad Ali 1982.jpg), and File:Tarick Salmaci w Hall of Fane Trainer Emanuel Steward (1992 Olympic Trials).jpg (File:Tarick Salmaci and Emanuel Steward.jpg, File:Tarick Salmaci and trainer Emanuel Steward- Olympic Tials.jpg and File:Tarick Salmaci with trainer Emanuel Steward.jpg) since I think those three are also reuploads of files previously deleted multiple times. The remaining file, File:Tarick Salmaci 2025.jpg, might be new but looks professionally taken and perhaps just needs VRT verification. Similar professional looking files were uploaded by Taricksalmaci, and those were deleted; I don't think this latest one, however, is a reupload. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:26, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Funko Pop Photo

You recently deleted a photo of mine which consisted of a Funko Pop exclusive from Hot Topic in the box. So I can have clarification about the copyright rule I violated, could you explain why you deleted my photo? Thanks. TarheelBornBred (talk) 01:38, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi, you likely refer to File:Hot Topic Funko Pop!.jpg. The file had been copyvio-tagged by User:Menakei. When I did a Google-Images-search, I found several other photos of the same item, though no identical hit. However, the real problem is that the depicted product-package shows enough creativity to be above threshold of opriginality; so per Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Product packaging it had to go.--Túrelio (talk) 07:35, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

File:WehebachTalsperre020.JPG

Hallo Túrelio, Du hattest die entfernung der Kategorie Category:Wehebachtalsperre bei der Datei File:WehebachTalsperre020.JPG entfernt. Ich hatte die Datei zur regulären Löschung eingetragen, und nachdem ich den Schaukasten, aus dem das Bild abfotografiert wurde vor Ort selbst gesehen habe, habe ich mit Copyvio die Schnellöschung beantragt. Der Baustein war gesetzt, als Du meine Änderung rückgängig gemacht hast. Ich frage mich, warum Du das gemacht hast, statt über die Schnelllöschung zu entscheiden. NDG (talk) 19:14, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi NDG, wie ich hier Commons:Deletion requests/File:WehebachTalsperre020.JPG kommentiert hatte, halte ich den copyvio-Verdacht für ungerechtfertigt und bin jetzt sehr erstaunt, dass ein Admin-Kollege die Datei trotz laufendem DR gerade gelöscht hat. --Túrelio (talk) 19:17, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Ich hatte das leider nicht unter Beobachtung, nach Studium der Definition gebe ich Dir recht. Allerdings sind Angaben und Lizenz in meinen Augen dann so nicht in Ordnung gewesen. NDG (talk) 19:27, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Also, eigentlich schon. Die Lizenzangabe bezieht sich ja auf das vom Hochlader erstellte "Reproduktionsfoto" und er hatte sogar im Klartext angegeben, dass es abfotografiert war. Was fehlte, war der FoP-Germany-Baustein, der sich aber hauptsächlich an Nachnutzer richtet. In diesem Fall hätte er allerdings vermutlich die Schnelllöschung verhindert. Weißt du ob es noch ein anderes Luftbild der Talsperre gibt? --Túrelio (talk) 19:33, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Ich habe heute mehrere erstellt und das gelöschte vor dem Copivio ersetzt NDG (talk) 19:43, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Ok. Dann können wir das erstmal so lassen. Das Bild war von der techn. Qualität her ja nicht so super. Mir ist gerade aufgefallen, dass in deinen Nikon-Uploads in den Metadaten (d)ein Klarname erscheint. Warst du dir dessen bewußt bzw. ist das ok für dich? --Túrelio (talk) 20:12, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Das ist nicht mein Klarname, sollte aber eigentlich nicht so sein. Wurde mir in der Vorschau nicht angezeigt. Wäre eigentlich besser, wenn der Name nicht dort steht. NDG (talk) 20:21, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Wir können es so machen: du entfernst den Namen aus den Metadaten (z.B. mit der Freeeware Exiftool), lädst die "gesäuberte" Dateifassung dann jeweils als "neue Version" über die alte Datei. Danach gibst du mir Bescheid bzw. am besten die Liste der Dateien und dann mache ich eine Revisionslöschung, wobei nur die unerwünschte Fassung weggelöscht wird. Ich gehe jetzt aber offline und bin morgen erstmal unterwegs. --Túrelio (talk) 20:25, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Besten Dank, das wird ein wenig Arbeit. Ich melde mich bei Dir! NDG (talk) 20:30, 8 June 2025 (UTC)